BBC political editor Laura Kuenssberg is facing criticism after appearing to quickly jump to the defence of the Prime Minister’s top adviser following reports he flouted lockdown rules.
Dominic Cummings faces a chorus of calls to resign after a joint Guardian and Mirror investigation revealed he had travelled 250 miles from London to Durham to visit his parents while sick with coronavirus.
READ MORE: Dominic Cummings investigated by police after flouting lockdown rules
He and his wife have argued they made the journey so his parents could take care of their son while they both suffered with Covid-19. Those who have symptoms of the virus are legally supposed to self-isolate for seven days.
Last night Kuenssberg publicly responded to the Mirror’s political editor Pippa Crerar, who had posted the story to her own Twitter profile, appearing to correct facts in the article in accordance with what she had heard from her own unnamed “source”.
Source says his trip was within guidelines as Cummings went to stay with his parents so they could help with childcare while he and his wife were ill - they insist no breach of lockdown
— Laura Kuenssberg (@bbclaurak) May 22, 2020
She told Crerar within an hour of the story being posted: “Source says his trip was within guidelines as Cummings went to stay with his parents so they could help with childcare while he and his wife were ill - they insist no breach of lockdown.”
She also tweeted the Mirror journalist to say: “PM's chief adviser did travel from London to County Durham during lockdown when he and his wife had coronavirus to stay in a separate building at his family's farm, a source close to him confirms - source says it is not true that he was spoken to by police ...”
Police have since publicly confirmed they did speak to the owners of a property where an individual was staying who had travelled from London to Durham.
Kuenssberg’s initial tweet to Crerar has racked up replies, with more than 10,000 people responding to the controversial post.
Journalist Aaron Bastani asked: “Is rebuttal for the PM's advisor your job?”
The government chose not to offer comment to the Mirror's story. Instead they briefed an anonymous quote to the BBC who ran with it breathlessly - trying to invalidate the mirror in the process. Pathetic
— Ross McCafferty (@RossMcCaff) May 22, 2020
Ross McCafferty added: “The government chose not to offer comment to the Mirror's story. Instead they briefed an anonymous quote to the BBC who ran with it breathlessly - trying to invalidate the mirror in the process. Pathetic.”
Meanwhile, people who would not typically be critical of the BBC got involved. George Turner tweeted: “I generally think that the criticism of Laura Kuenssberg is absurd, but it is a bit odd for the BBC political editor to be rebutting another journalist's story with an unnamed source.”
I have to say I find it very hard to defend Laura Kuenssberg's behaviour. We don't pay her to act as Cummings's mouthpiece.
— (((Frances "Cassandra" Coppola))) (@Frances_Coppola) May 22, 2020
Commentator Frances Coppola added: “I have to say I find it very hard to defend Laura Kuenssberg's behaviour. We don't pay her to act as Cummings's mouthpiece.”
Sources close to Cummings have briefed journalists that he has no intention to resign, but pressure is likely to be put on Number 10 over the next few days to explain why the senior adviser’s behaviour was acceptable.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel