SCOTTISH Tory leader Jackson Carlaw is now facing an open rebellion after four of the most senior members of his Holyrood team broke ranks over the Dominic Cummings saga.
Murdo Fraser, Donald Cameron, Graham Simpson and Adam Tomkins have spoken out over the Prime Minister's decision not to sack his chief aide – despite their boss Carlaw insisting it is a matter for Boris Johnson.
The three men are central figures in Carlaw's frontbench team. Fraser covers the constitution portfolio, Cameron, finance, Tomkins the social society brief, while Simpson holds the housing brief.
In correspondence to a constituent, Fraser wrote: "My own personal view on the matter, on the basis of the information currently available, is that Mr Cummings did break the rules, and therefore, as someone who is [in] a position of authority, he should step down from the post."
He added: "I have communicated this view to the Prime Minister through the appropriate channels."
Carlaw initially refused to demand for Cummings to go. “I've heard what the Prime Minister has said and it is a situation for him to judge," he said at the weekend.
The Scottish Tory leader has since called for the PM's top aide to resign.
READ MORE: Jackson Carlaw FINALLY calls for Dominic Cummings to resign
Douglas Ross, the parliamentary under-secretary of state for Scotland, announced his resignation that he was quitting after hearing Cummings' efforts to defend his trip from London to Durham.
The first resignation over the allegations rocking the Government came as Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove sought to defend his longstanding ally as having acted in an "entirely reasonable" way, and within the law.
But Ross, the MP for Moray, said that "while the intentions may have been well-meaning", Cummings' interpretation of the rules was "not shared by the vast majority of people".
"I have constituents who didn't get to say goodbye to loved ones; families who could not mourn together; people who didn't visit sick relatives because they followed the guidance of the Government," the Tory MP for Moray wrote.
"I cannot in good faith tell them they were all wrong and one senior adviser to the Government was right."
Cameron supported Ross's decision to resign. Responding to his announcement on Twitter this morning, Cameron wrote: "Well done, my friend.”
Well done, my friend. https://t.co/3olEvEkRzX
— Donald Cameron MSP (@DAJCameron) May 26, 2020
Tomkins, a Glasgow MSP, was the first senior Scots Tory to speak out this morning – saying losing Ross from the UK Government was a “disaster”.
Tomkins tweeted: “It shows exactly why Cummings should be sacked. I suspect others will follow where Douglas has led.”
A fourth Scottish Tory shadow cabinet member Graham Simpson also broke ranks and called for the PM's chief aide to go.
“I don’t like calling for people to resign or be sacked – there is too much of that. I tend to believe in giving people the chance to say sorry and learn. In this case though I think Mr Cummings should go,” he wrote.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon: Douglas Ross resignation was 'fair play'
A No 10 spokesman said Johnson "regrets" Ross's decision to quit.
The resignation came amid continued concerns over how the Prime Minister's defence of Cummings will affect the public, police and health workers during the pandemic.
In an extraordinary press conference for an adviser, Cummings argued that his journey to Durham in March was justified as he sought to protect his family's health.
But many questions remained unanswered, including over his subsequent drive to Barnard Castle which he said was to test his eyesight after it was affected by Covid-19.
Former Greater Manchester Police chief constable Sir Peter Fahy said officers had become "frustrated" by the fiasco, which may hinder policing with the rules "now very confused".
And he suggested that Cummings' trip to Barnard Castle "certainly appears to be against the Highway Code - it's not the way to test your eyesight, and put potentially other people in danger".
He also said "it may well be that absolutely he'd have been turned back" by officers if they stopped him during the drive north from London in March.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel