CONCERNS have been raised over coronavirus fake news on UK social media channels after the SNP's Westminster leader was falsely accused of taking Covid-19 to Skye by supporters of Dominic Cummings.
Ian Blackford's name and the west coast island were trending on Twitter on Tuesday night as a number of accounts accused him of flouting lockdown.
The deputy editor of right-wing platform Breitbart News, Jack Montgomery, was amongst those to call for a media investigation of Blackford over his return home from Westminster as parliament shut at the beginning of lockdown.
At the time, Blackford stated that he had gone home "but into isolation as a precaution" away from his wife Ann, who has an underlying health condition, "and everyone else given the prevalence of the virus in London", adding: "The right thing go do but hard not seeing Ann. #StayHomeSaveLives."
The MP's movements were within the rules, in common with Commons colleagues who returned to their homes around the UK.
At the time of posting – March 26 – the post generated little response. However, after Blackford called for the PM's adviser Dominic Cummings to go over his lockdown travel to Durham over coronavirus infection fears, it has been shared countless times along with allegations that the politician may have caused the fatal outbreak at Skye's Home Farm care home which devastated the community.
Many of these claims have been circulated by anonymised accounts, while Breitbart has suggested that Blackford has "no moral high ground to demand Cummings’ termination for leaving London when he did the same thing".
But supporters of Blackford, who represents Ross, Skye and Lochaber, says he has become the target of a politically-motivated campaign. A friend of the MP, who did not want to be named, said that move is an attempt to "change the narrative of a scandal that is a direct challenge to the authority of the Prime Minister and has serious implications for public health".
And a spokesperson for the politician said: "Ian was travelling home from parliament, as all MPs were doing at the time. This is a farcical twitter disinformation campaign by a far-right website, who are trying – and failing – to distract from the actions of Dominic Cummings."
The Cummings affair also triggered a wave of claims by online accounts claiming that it was a confection aimed at derailing Brexit. Supporters of the Vote Leave campaigner called for a boycott of traditional platforms and claimed he was the victim of a #mediawitchhunt, with #scummedia also trending.
The Twitter account of the Leave.EU campaign, which has more than 292,000 followers, called it "Brexit vengeance, pure and simple".
Sarah Pederson, Professor of Communications and Media at Robert Gordon University in Aberdeen, said the message prove how the story has "broken through the usual bubble of journalists and politicians in a way that few political stories have in the last few years", expressing "concern" about "the spread of false allegations".
Pederson said: "We are now seeing the construction of ‘us and them’ narratives around mainstream media and the general public that are more reminiscent of the state of media in the US."
She went on: "In his own statement, Dominic Cummings attempted to reframe the story as being about the mainstream media [MSM] – suggesting that the MSM was purveying fake news for its own ends, and it is this narrative that has been taken up by some sections of social media.
"Ironically this narrative was one broadcast into our homes by the mainstream media on Bank Holiday Monday.
"I would suggest that the strong role that MSM has played in this story – and the overall unified framing from both left and right-leaning newspapers – has led to a backlash online where the alternative framing, pushed by Cummings and various government voices, has been better able to spread.
"It is important that all sides of a story are given an airing of course, but it is important that this debate is grounded in facts and not fake news."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel