PROBABLY the first time most people learned that Dominic Cummings wrote a blog was when it was revealed last week that he had been caught altering it months later to make himself look like a prophet. Oops.
Some of us have been reading it for a while now, on www.dominiccummings.comand you suspect Boris Johnson is not one of us. Had he read it, he might not have been so enthusiastic in proclaiming Cummings’s genius, given the signs it sends out. Or then again, maybe the Prime Minister did read it avidly and decided that Cummings was the Machiavelli – Domniavelli as I call him – he needed to do his dirty work.
The clues are in the “tell”, as a poker player would say, on a blog he doesn’t write every day as there are often long periods between entries. So here’s a simple interpretation of what Domniavelli wrote.
(To undertake a little exegesis of the blog does not confer on it the status of Holy Writ. Rather it makes clear to even a casual observer that the man, the mind, of Cummings can be detected in what he has written.)
In places it is surprisingly readable. In others it’s far too jargon-filled – so much for the master of the simple message – but frankly it’s more true than anything his boss ever produced in a journalistic career filled with bombast and balderdash. It also goes off at tangents, and is no less entertaining for that.
His most famous and most repeated post was in January when he called for a different sort of people to work for him and Boris, but mostly him. These included data scientists and software developers, economists, policy experts, project managers and communication experts, plus “junior researchers, one of whom will also be my personal assistant”. Good luck with that, whoever got the job, or gets it in future.
Famously he added “weirdos and misfits with odd skills” and explained why: “We want to improve performance and make me much less important – and within a year largely redundant. At the moment I have to make decisions well outside what Charlie Munger calls my ‘circle of competence’ and we do not have the sort of expertise supporting the PM and ministers that is needed. This must change fast so we can properly serve the public.”
There you have it in his own words: he isn’t up to the job. And he added: “I don’t really know what I’m looking for but I want people around
Number 10 to be on the lookout for such people.” Yup, he really wrote that.
Sometimes the devil is in his detail. In one of his blogs on why a second EU referendum had to be avoided, he wrote: “Vote Leave hacked the referendum.” That’s an astonishing admission that nobody has seized on.
READ MORE: Ian Blackford makes formal call for Dominic Cummings probe
Cummings is hugely into complexity and predictions and had – and probably still has – an obsession with Labour and the SNP joining up to defeat Brexit.
As a student of ancient and modern history, he is familiar with the work of many historians, but his principal “go-to” historian was a general in ancient Greece – Thucydides, who lived in the 5th century BC and whose History of the Peloponnesian War is our main source for information on that conflict.
He quotes with seeming approval this passage from Thucydides, as translated by Benjamin Jowett: “Thus revolution gave birth to every form of wickedness in Greece. The simplicity which is so large an element in a noble nature was laughed to scorn and disappeared … In general, the dishonest more easily gain credit for cleverness than the simple do for goodness; men take pride in one, but are ashamed of the other ... The cause of all these evils was the love of power, originating in avarice and ambition.”
There are so many other insights that can be gained from reading the blog. Try it.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel