A DISTILLERY is making its first foray into blended malt Scotch whisky – re-telling the story of the malt tax protests that took place in Scotland in the 18th century in the process.
The Glasgow Distillery Company’s Malt Riot Blended Malt Scotch Whisky is described as a selected blend of handpicked single malts from across Scotland, with the distillery’s Glasgow 1770 Single Malt at its heart.
The malt tax protests took place in 1725. Held in Glasgow and then across the nation, they demanded the tax on malted barley be overturned. In Glasgow, malt stores were barricaded and excisemen chased from the city. The home of the local MP and former collector of taxes for the Port of Glasgow, who originally supported the introduction of the malt tax, Daniel Campbell, was destroyed.
Campbell was compensated by the city of Glasgow and used the money to purchase the island of Islay and part of Jura. He encouraged local farmers to seed surplus barley and ignited the legal production of single malt Scotch whisky.
Distillery CEO and co-founder Liam Hughes said: “The story of the malt riots is a really powerful one but has been largely forgotten.
“This year has been an extremely challenging time for all in light of Covid-19. For Glasgow Distillery, the launch of Malt Riot, following on from the release of Glasgow 1770 Single Malt Whisky – Triple Distilled Release No.1, is hopefully the start of some return to normality.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here