SOME people find Jacob Rees-Mogg’s buffoonery funny. A political Laurel to Boris Johnson’s Hardy. But the plans he’s unveiled for Westminster’s return are anything but amusing.
MPs have been participating in Parliament remotely for weeks. And we’ve been voting electronically. It’s worked well. Or at least it’s worked well for everybody but Boris Johnson. Without an audience of screaming Tory backbenchers cheering on his every utterance, he’s looked bereft – a bumbling panto act on an empty stage.
Something had to be done to rescue him from weekly humiliation at Prime Minister’s Questions. He needed his guffawing entourage back, and the result is a parliamentary outrage. Rejecting opposition proposals for a compromise, the UK Government has said that MPs “may only participate physically within the Parliamentary estate" – plans so detached from reality they are dangerous, even by Rees-Mogg’s preposterous standards.
READ MORE: Scottish MPs locked out of Westminster as virtual voting axed
Apparently unironically, the Leader of the House has called upon MPs – many of whom are shielding for health reasons – to invoke “British resolution and fortitude in these difficult times" by travelling hundreds of miles to Westminster during a pandemic, only to do in person what last week they did on their smartphones The barmy plans would see 650 MPs required to queue in a 1.2-kilometre line to ensure that a requisite two metres of distance can be maintained between them – a process expected to take more than two and a half hours FOR EACH VOTE. This compared to the 15 minutes it takes to vote electronically – the effective system now abandoned by the Leader of the House, a middle-aged child who continues to play a starring role in an 18th century costume drama of his own imagination.
Given the Speaker has already made it clear he will limit the number of MPs on the green benches to 50, and will not hesitate to call an end to proceedings if he thinks they have become unsafe, it’s completely pointless and reckless to insist that six hundred additional MPs who will not be allowed into the Chamber should be forced to make weekly trips to London, risking spreading the virus to each other and then throughout their communities in every corner of the UK.
WATCH: 'You think this is funny?' – Ian Blackford blasts laughing Tories
The plans will effectively disenfranchise Scottish, Welsh, Northern Irish, disabled and ill MPs, who face being locked out of Parliament to satisfy the fetishes of Rees-Mogg and his out-of-touch band of fundamentalists in the Conservative Party. It is an affront to public health, common sense and democracy.
Not only do the plans ride roughshod over Scotland's public health guidance (and indeed that of the UK Government) which is unequivocal: work from home where possible. Jacob Rees-Mogg still believes Parliament must return to “set an example” to the British public, even as he and his colleagues refuse to do so themselves.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel