A SENSATIONAL new poll has revealed strong public backing for a “Plan B” route to avoid a Westminster veto and achieve independence for Scotland.
A clear majority of Scots (63%) think the SNP and Greens should consider putting independence – not just a referendum – on the ballot paper in an election if a UK prime minister continues to reject requests for a Section 30 Order.
The Panelbase poll, commissioned by ScotGoesPop, asked the question: “If Boris Johnson and the UK Government manage to block an independence referendum, do you think that pro-independence parties such as the SNP and the Greens should consider including an outright promise of independence in their manifestos for a future election, to give people an opportunity to vote for or against the idea?”
When “don’t knows” are excluded, 63% of respondents say this would be a good idea, while 37% did not agree.
A shocking 45% of Labour voters who responded to the poll said that they also feel that pro-independence parties should make such a promise.
That’s despite the party itself last week declaring that it would continue to oppose a second independence referendum, with Scottish Labour leader Richard Leonard stating: “If the Covid-19 pandemic has taught us anything it’s that people do not want to be divided.” Just 35% of Labour’s voters would be opposed to the move.
READ MORE: Strong public backing for alternative routes to independence
Boris Johnson rejected Nicola Sturgeon’s request for a Section 30 order back in January following the SNP’s General Election performance at the end of last year.
Having won 47 of Scotland’s 59 constituencies in December’s vote, the First Minister stated at the time that: “The Tories are terrified of Scotland having the right to choose our own future.”
The Prime Minister ruled it out on the basis that he was upholding “the democratic decision of the Scottish people” from 2014.
James Kelly, of the ScotGoesPop blog, suggests that promising independence in a manifesto in future elections could help to avoid further rejection. He argues that should a pro-indy party then win an overall majority of seats, they could declare it as a mandate in order to negotiate further, with “no realistic way that the Tories could prevent the vote from taking place”.
It comes after Sunday night’s revelation that, based on current voting intentions, the SNP could be looking at a massive win in next year’s Holyrood elections – which again would grant a mandate to push for a second referendum.
READ MORE: SNP set for huge Holyrood election win and mandate for indyref2
It would also pile on the pressure for the Prime Minister to grant a Section 30 order, thereby transferring powers over to Holyrood in order to hold a vote.
And last week we reported that, with a surge of support for independence in the aftermath of the Dominic Cummings scandal, 52% of people now back Yes when it comes to independence.
It was the fourth Panelbase poll on independence in 2020 so far, with the sequence of results for Yes being 52%, 49%, 50% and 52%. Kelly said each of those results are within the margin of error.
READ MORE: James Kelly: How the polls show a perfect storm for Unionism
Keith Brown, the SNP’s depute leader, said: “The process by which we choose Scotland’s future must be capable of actually achieving independence.
“It must allow majority support to be expressed clearly and unambiguously.
“It must be legal. And it must have the recognition of the international community.
“The SNP will remain focused not just on delivering a referendum but on delivering an independent Scotland.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel