A CONSERVATIVE councillor has called slave trader Edward Colston a “hero” amid a row over his statue being pulled down in Bristol.
The statue of the 17th-century slave trader, which had stood in the city since 1895, was dumped into Bristol Harbour during Black Lives Matter protests at the weekend.
The trader, who has many landmarks in Bristol named after him, is believed to have transported tens of thousands of people from Africa to the Americas and at one point was the deputy governor of the Royal African Company – which held a monopoly in slave trading.
READ MORE: Behind Edward Colston and Scotland's slave traders
Prior to protesters pulling the statue down themselves there had been more than 10,000 signatures on a petition asking the council to remove it.
Local councillor Richard Eddy said he was “horrified and appalled” by the weekend’s scenes.
Eddy – who said two years ago that vandalising or stealing a proposed second plaque on the statue explaining Colston’s links to slavery may be “justified” – told Bristol Live that he was “appalled by the rank lawlessness” seen in clips of the statue coming down.
READ MORE: WATCH: Farage slammed for comparing Black Lives Matter to Taliban
He went on: “Edward Colston to me and generations of Bristolians stands out as a hero whose wealth has continued to benefit the housing, education and healthcare of the citizens of this city.”
The councillor also said he’d received more mail about the statue being removed than any other issue in such a short space of time in his 28-year political service.
Eddy is a former deputy leader of the Tory group at Bristol City Council. He resigned from the position in 2001 over outrage for using a golliwog doll as his mascot.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel