THE Battle of Bannockburn site was found vandalised yesterday with graffiti branding Robert the Bruce a “racist king” and calling for his statue to be removed.
Images on social media appeared to show markings on the wall at the visitor centre and the statue.
National Trust for Scotland bosses, who operate the centre, said they were “disappointed” by the act.
The general manager for Edinburgh and East, Stuart Maxwell, said: “We are very disappointed by the vandalism of the iconic Bruce statue at Bannockburn and the A listed rotunda.
"This comes at a time when our charity is suffering serious financial hardship and this is a cost we could do without.
"We would like to thank the local community for their support in responding so quickly to this incident.
"A contractor will visit the site this afternoon.”
Other locals branded the vandalism “disgusting” as the images were shared widely online.
Graffiti on the visitor centre wall read: “Robert was a racist, bring down the statue.”
The spray-paint on the statue reads “Racist king BLM” and “Black Lives Matter”.
Stirling Police are now investigating the graffiti, which nobody has claimed responsibility for.
A spokesperson said: “We were made aware on Friday, June 12, of vandalism to the Battle of Bannockburn heritage site, near Stirling. Enquiries are ongoing.”
Meanwhile local MP Alyn Smith said: “I’m aware with @RHBruceCrawford of vandalism at the Bannockburn site. @StirlingCouncil is on it and this will be cleared soon. I’ve been vocal in my support of #BlackLivesMatter and hope such counterproductive stupidity is an isolated incident.”
READ MORE: Was Robert the Bruce really a 'racist king'?
It comes after campaigners Topple the Racists identified more than a dozen statues in Scotland with links to slavery and colonialism which they say should be removed.
However, the Bannockburn site was not identified on that interactive map - and the Bruce was not involved in racist slavery, as the trade did not include Scotland or Scots until centuries after his death in 1329.
The removal of the statue of slave trader Edward Colston in Bristol at the weekend has sparked a conversation about what the UK’s public statues represent.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel