WINSTON Churchill's image briefly disappeared from Google search results because it was being updated to be more representative of the former prime minister, the tech giant has said.
However, that update had been delayed by a bug in Google's system, the firm said in a statement.
It comes after some users complained that Churchill's image was not appearing in search results for UK prime ministers, although his name was still listed.
Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden was among those to express "concern" and said he had spoken to the tech giant over the incident, which occurred during the ongoing debate about Churchill's statue in Parliament Square, which was boarded up last week.
Spoke to @GoogleUK early this am regarding concern of missing image of Churchill
— Oliver Dowden (@OliverDowden) June 14, 2020
Pleased to say now resolved (people may have to clear their cookies to see the image)
Awaiting a full explanation of what happened from Google - they believe an error rather than deliberate
Following claims from some that the missing image was a political move, Google said it was sorry for the concern and insisted it was "not purposeful".
The company said it was a result of the firm updating the featured image of Churchill from one of him as a younger man to another of him when older, which the company said was when he was "more famously and iconically pictured".
The company said the update to the Knowledge Graph – the prominent panels which appear at the top of search result pages – had taken place at the end of April following user feedback, but a bug in its systems had resulted in the new image not appearing.
"Following our procedures, human reviewers processed the feedback, determined the image wasn't most representative of Churchill and we blocked the unrepresentative image to allow the systems to automatically select a different one, according to our policies," the tech giant said.
"Normally, the image would update quickly. In this case, a bug in our systems prevented a new representative image from updating. As a result, Churchill's entry lacked an image from late April until this weekend, when the issue was brought to our attention and resolved soon after.
"We apologise again for concerns caused by this issue with Sir Winston Churchill's Knowledge Graph image. We will be working to address the underlying cause to avoid this type of issue in the future."
Google also confirmed it was looking into why the first terms of some UK prime ministers, including Churchill, Harold Wilson, Ramsay MacDonald and Stanley Baldwin were not being properly shown in the Knowledge Graph.
"It might be that our systems are only displaying the last term of prime ministers who had non-consecutive terms. We'll seek to address this to avoid any unintentional concern," Google said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel