THE Health Secretary was keen to heap praise on the footballer who campaigned tirelessly to extend England’s free school meals scheme over the summer holidays today – but not knowing his name made the efforts a bit tricky.
Asked about the UK Government’s U-turn on the scheme, Matt Hancock told Kay Burley: “I’ll tell you what happened. The Prime Minister talked to Daniel Rashford, he considered it and made his decision, I think it’s terrific.”
Gary Lineker tweeted out the clip, saying it was good to see ministers giving credit to footballers – Daniel Rashford in particular.
Good to see @MattHancock finally giving credit to footballers and Daniel Rashford in particular pic.twitter.com/b3lcqsTcP7
— Gary Lineker (@GaryLineker) June 17, 2020
The England striker himself replied: “I’ve been called much worse over the last couple of days,” followed by a laughing emoji.
Hancock later moved on to speak to BBC Breakfast, who told him “Daniel Rashford” was already trending on social media.
Laughing in front of his pop art of the Queen, Hancock said: “I completely misspoke!”
Asked to explain what happened, Hancock went on: “I can’t, of course I know he’s called Marcus Rashford.
😬 "Of course I know he's called Marcus Rashford."
— BBC Breakfast (@BBCBreakfast) June 17, 2020
If you're wondering why 'Daniel Rashford' is trending... This is why ⤵️#BBCBreakfast #MattHancock pic.twitter.com/2pTwseh0m1
“I think I said that once and then several other times I said I’ve no idea, I just completely misspoke.
“Too early in the morning.”
Later, during an interview with BBC Radio 4, Hancock said twice that he was “really proud of” Rashford. Online the Cabinet member was accused of being “patronising”.
Also this morning, Hancock was challenged by Burley to explain which countries the UK’s £650m quarantine for air travellers scheme is protecting us from – given that the UK has the fifth highest number of confirmed cases in the world.
Hancock would only cite Brazil as an example even though the US has more than double the number of positive tests as the nation and the highest number of cases in the world.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel