NICOLA Sturgeon has accused Boris Johnson of putting “commercial and political ambition” ahead of the needs of the world’s poorest people by scrapping the Department for International Development (Dfid).
Scotland’s First Minister said the decision to merge Dfid with the Foreign Office is a “regrettable move”, although she welcomed the Prime Minister’s pledge that no jobs in Scotland would be put at risk as a consequence.
READ MORE: Backlash as Boris Johnson merges Scottish department with Foreign Office
Johnson said abolishing Dfid will be of “huge benefit” to the UK’s overseas aid mission but has been criticised by aid charities, opposition MPs and three former prime ministers.
Speaking at First Minister’s Questions, Sturgeon said: “I fundamentally disagree with the decision that was announced yesterday to merge the Foreign and Commonwealth Office with Dfid in this way because I think it puts foreign policy, I think it puts commercial and political ambition, ahead of the needs of the world’s poorest and most vulnerable communities at a time of global crisis.
“That’s why I think it is a regrettable move in the context in which it was made.”
READ MORE: Matt Hancock: Decision to close DFiD not discussed in Cabinet
The department’s Scottish base at Abercrombie House in East Kilbride, South Lanarkshire, employs around 600 staff.
Asked on Tuesday about the department’s workers, Johnson said: “Of course, we’re going to keep those jobs in East Kilbride and of course we are going to support the work of those fantastic people in East Kilbride.”
In response to a question from the town’s MSP Linda Fabiani, Sturgeon added: “It’s incumbent on all of us to hold the UK Government to that commitment on behalf of the hundreds of people who work in East Kilbride.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel