MSPS are objecting to a proposed “power grab” by Westminster as a result of Brexit. They claim the new UK Environment Bill represents a “very real and significant change” to the devolution settlement.
In a hard-hitting critique of the Bill, Holyrood’s Environment, Climate Change and Land Reform Committee is calling for powers which fall within devolved competence, including environment policy, to return to the Scottish Parliament on EU exit day.
In advance of a debate on the motion to be held in the Scottish Parliament, the committee is now writing to both the UK and Scottish Governments asking for a full explanation of the rationale for sharing powers.
In its report, the committee asks why environmental powers in devolved competence should be made via UK, as opposed to Scottish, primary legislation.
It believes that the Bill as it stands would allow the Scottish Parliament limited scope to influence decisions on devolved policy, to scrutinise relevant legislation and its implementation and therefore effectively hold Scottish Ministers to account.
READ MORE: Alison Anderson: Tories forced to use ‘shock and awe’ to make Brexit palatable
“There is an urgent need for new laws to be put in place to safeguard frameworks previously provided for by EU law – but legislation which is not at the expense of the devolved powers of the Scottish Parliament,” said committee convener Gillian Martin. “To pass this Bill would represent a very real and significant change to the devolution settlement.
“Of course there will be policy areas where it makes sense to legislate to establish a joint scheme with the rest of the UK, but decisions about environmental policy in Scotland should be made in the Scottish Parliament, by members of the Scottish Parliament, to whom Scottish Ministers are accountable.
“Our committee has one voice on this issue – that only Scottish primary legislation will enable full Scottish parliamentary scrutiny and accountability of these legislative proposals and therefore respect the devolution settlement. Our report speaks for itself and lays bare why we are unable to make recommendations in relation to this Legislative Consent Memorandum.”
The UK Environment Bill was introduced by the UK Government in the House of Commons in January. Much of environmental policy is currently devolved to the Scottish Parliament but the UK Government is asking the Scottish Parliament to delegate its legislative powers to UK ministers, at Scottish Ministers’ discretion, for provisions relating to producer responsibility, resource efficiency, electronic tracking of relevant waste, air and water quality, chemicals and consequential provisions.
READ MORE: Robin McAlpine: Why an independent Scotland is the only route
The new Bill, which had its second reading in Parliament in February, has been criticised by environmental groups for lacking ambition and for failing to include legal requirements to prevent backsliding on environmental regulation.
Both opposition and Tory MPs were critical of what they said was a lack of ambition in the improvement of air quality. They also said the proposed new environmental watchdog, the Office for Environmental Protection (OEP), would be insufficiently independent from the Government and would not be able to hold it to account. It is feared standards will fall due to the problems caused by Brexit and the need to obtain trade deals with countries which have lower environmental standards, such as the US.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel