AT the end of the week Dame Vera Lynn died, triggering a new outpouring of World War Two nostalgia. Cliff Richard and Michael Ball were interviewed and news programmes were flooded with tributes and remembrance.
The Queen had previously echoed Dame Vera’s famous WW2 anthem during a speech aimed at people separated from families and friends during the coronavirus lockdown in April. She told the nation: “We will be with our friends again, we will be with our families again, we will meet again.” Prime Minister Boris Johnson said Dame Vera’s “charm and magical voice entranced and uplifted our country in some of our darkest hours”. Some claimed she had helped Britain win the war.
But who am I to mock people who went through a war together? I’m nobody and there’s nothing wrong with remembering someone – especially for older people who are isolated and frightened.
But the singer’s death did seem like another marker in a passing of time as Britain morphs and dissolves. For a country drenched in nostalgia, looking backwards and constantly referencing the war is a problem. For a society in lockdown looking backwards to the pre-Covid world has become an obsession now heightened as “lifting the lockdown” beckons. We’ve been locked into this worldview for a while. The thankfully now dead Keep Calm and Carry On meme dates from August 2011, when an entrepreneur registered the slogan. Brexit groaned with regret and bitterness, harking back to a mythical lost Britain of the 1950s with a thinly coded sub-message of: Make Britain White Again. Now the promises and expectations of “taking back control” and the sunny uplands of Brexit are looking shabbier than ever as “statue defenders” protect an imagined past with relentless violence and Downing Street is forced to defend Boris Johnson’s decision to spend nearly £1 million of taxpayers’ money getting his RAF Voyager painted in red white and blue.
READ MORE: Alison Anderson: Tories forced to use ‘shock and awe’ to make Brexit palatable
But if the symbolic is working hard to obliterate the harsh reality of British failure, it will have to work harder. On Thursday the campaign to bring down a statue of Cecil Rhodes at Oxford University marked a significant victory after Oriel College voted in favour of removing the controversial statue. The campaign group Rhodes Must Fall in Oxford called for the removal of a statue of the slave owner Christopher Codrington at All Souls College and for increased representation of BAME students and staff. They said the project to “decolonise” the institution would not end with the removal of the memorial. Over at Twickenham the RFU has decided to cease the singing of Swing Low, Sweet Chariot by England supporters, admitting that many of them are unaware of its origins as a song about slavery. England fans have previously been criticised for “cross-cultural appropriation of a US slave song”, and the Black Lives Matter movement has brought renewed focus on its airing at Twickenham and matches abroad.
As the collision between myth and reality, modernity and imperial past continues, what is left is a void culture. Into this chasm steps the unfortunate Dominic Raab who this week responded to an interviewers question about “taking the knee”: “I take the knee for two people: the Queen and the missus when I asked her to marry me.” As a nation processed the political-psychological implications of this statement Raab threw in that he thought the action had something to do with Game of Thrones.
This year’s reality seems to shift between feeling like an episode of The Simpsons and Terry Nation’s post-apocalyptic TV show The Survivors. As moods swing between tenacity and trauma we engage in the trivia of watching the drama unfold and tending to our domestic inertia. This notion of the past catching up with us seems irresistible, as if long decades of denial and manipulation of the past is now overtaking us. The notion of “erasing history” has become a desperate slogan for those denying this process and clinging to a reality constructed in stone and bronze adorning plinths erected by our white forefathers.
But if this history has been created it has also been destroyed.
REPORTING on British efforts to re-write and expunge history the journalist Iain Cobain has studied something called Operation Legacy which has been described as “an orgy of destruction”, carried out across the globe between the 1940s and the 70s.
In 2013 he discovered that the Foreign and Commonwealth Office had been unlawfully concealing over a million historical files at a highly secure government compound at Hanslope Park in London. The files contained millions of records stretching back to 1662, spanning the slave trade, the Boer wars, two world wars and the Cold War period. More than 20,000 files concerned the withdrawal from empire. This was a gold mine of deceit and cover-up. He discovered that when the files concerned were eventually transferred to the UK’s National Archives – where they should have been all along – it became clear that enormous amounts of information had been systematically destroyed during the process of decolonisation.
READ MORE: Common Weal unveil plans for New Green Deal in independent Scotland
Cobain writes: “Beginning in India in 1947, government officials had incinerated material that would in any way embarrass Her Majesty’s government, her armed forces or her colonial civil servants. At the end of that year an Observer correspondent noted large palls of smoke appearing over government offices in Jerusalem.
‘‘As decolonisation gathered pace, British officials developed a series of parallel file registries in the colonies – one that was to be handed over to post-independence governments, and one that contained papers that were to be steadily destroyed or flown back to London. In Uganda in March 1961, colonial officials gave this process a new name: Operation Legacy. Before long the term spread to neighbouring colonies, where only “British subjects of European descent” were to be involved in the weeding and destruction of documents, a process that was overseen by police special branch officers.”
Particular effort had been taken to obliterate the truth about the torture and murder of rebels in Kenya, the brutal suppression of rebellions in Cyprus and later Aden, massacres in Malaya and the coup against a democratically elected government in British Guiana.
“Instructions were also issued on the means by which papers should be destroyed: when they were burned, the waste should be reduced to ash and the ashes broken up.” In Kenya, officials were informed that “it is permissible, as an alternative to destruction by fire, for documents to packed in weighed crates and dumped in very deep and current-free waters at maximum practicable distance from the coast”.
This last month has seemed like those crates have floated to the surface, and that Operation Legacy, a conscious effort to deny our racist colonial imperial past had failed.
As Britain seems to try to immerse itself in the past it is also overtaken by it.
But this is not just about hiding a shameful past. This process is happening now. It’s not just that the world we imagined we would be living has changed from when we were children – the world we imagined we would be living from last week has changed completely too. Simple things like the security of employment, availability of housing and education are now radically uncertain. Precarity, previously the state of being of an unfortunate section of the workforce dependent on the gig economy has now become a universal syndrome. Our precarious existence now extends way beyond our material or psychological welfare but to our health and even our existence.
So if people cling to bits of history and fragments of reality that has dissolved maybe we shouldn’t blame them, because that’s what we’re doing too.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel