ONE of Scotland’s leading pollsters has given his assessment of a new survey which found support for independence at 54%, with a significant shift in opinion towards Yes among the middle class and previously undecided voters.
Support for Scottish independence is now the highest it has been since August 2015, when Ipsos Mori recorded 55% of Scots would vote Yes if another referendum was held.
Mark Diffley, who ran both polls, pointed out that 69% of those under 35 were now saying they would vote Yes in addition to 41% of those aged 55 or over. He also noted that social class difference appeared to be less significant in terms of how people were likely to vote in a new referendum than was the case in the 2014 plebiscite, when people on higher incomes tended to back the Union.
“Social class less significant in poll – 49% of ‘middle class’ voters say would vote Yes – pretty significant shift,” he wrote on Twitter.
Diffley pointed out too that in further significant changes from the 2014 referendum, almost a quarter of No voters would now vote Yes, while less than 10% of Yes voters would change their vote to No.
He also noted that among people who didn’t vote almost six years ago, 56% said they would now vote Yes, while 44% would vote No.
“Finally, movement ref 2014 really interesting. 23% of No voters now saying Yes versus 9% moving Yes to No. 56% of those who didn’t vote in 2014 would vote Yes, 44% No,” Diffley added.
The poll was commissioned by the pro-independence organisation Business for Scotland and was conducted by the polling company Panelbase. The polling company carried out an online survey of 1070 Scots from June 15 to 19.
It found that excluding undecideds, 54% of voters would vote for independence, while 46% would back the Union.
It is the highest result since 53% backed independence in September 2015 after the General Election, which returned a Tory majority.
The change comes a fortnight after the Scottish Labour leadership reaffirmed the party’s opposition to a second referendum.
The Scottish Government planned to hold a second independence referendum this year but paused plans for the vote at the outset of the coronavirus pandemic.
A debate over the process of how to achieve independence is also taking place. Ahead of the 2014 referendum – won by the Union side by 55% to 45% – Former First Minister Alex Salmond struck a deal with prime minister David Cameron for powers to be temporarily transferred to Holyrood to hold the legally binding vote.
However, Boris Johnson has repeatedly rejected a demand by Nicola Sturgeon for a Section 30 order, insisting Scotland’s constitutional future was settled in 2014.
His rejection of the First Minister’s demand has prompted some in the SNP – including senior Inverclyde councillor Chris McEleny and MP Angus MacNeil, to suggest the need for an alternative way to achieve independence.
But Plan B has been met by some criticism. The SNP’s Pete Wishart has said it could result in Scotland being stuck in a Catalonian situation, where people voted for independence but were unable to achieve it.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel