THE SNP’S BAME convener has said he understands why more than a third of all black people believe his party is institutionally racist.
Graham Campbell’s comments came after a poll carried out for CNN suggested that the UK’s political parties had much to do win over black, Asian and minority ethnic communities.
It suggested that 34% of all black people thought the SNP were institutionally racist, lower than the 58% who believed the same was true of the Tories, but more than the 31% who believed Labour and the LibDems had a race problem.
Campbell, a councillor in Glasgow, said he hoped Scotland’s BAME communities would see the SNP as an actively anti-racist party.
He said: “As the SNP’s first-ever BAME convener elected by conference I can attest to the party’s sterling efforts to increase the levels of representation from BAME communities from the present seven councillors and one MSP.
“All Scottish institutions – given our history as a nation involved slavery and colonialism – necessarily will have questions to answer about the impact of institutionalised racism.
“With the caveat that I’d be surprised if that polling represented the views of 34% of Scots BAME people, I do understand the concerns being raised.
“I hope Scotland’s BAME communities will see from the leadership shown by our party and by our First Minister on issues of tackling racism – and by my own involvement in the party’s NEC – that we are an actively anti-racist party.
“By seeking to challenge discrimination wherever we find it – including if it arises within our party – we set an example that Scotland is a country that will not tolerate racism or bigotry.”
There was anger last year when the SNP unveiled an entirely white roster of candidates for the general election. They were the only major party in Scotland not have at least one candidate from a BAME background.
Writing in The National at the time, Humza Yousaf said it was “not good enough”.
He called for “a forensic examination of our processes as a party to ensure there are no structural barriers in the way for black, Asian and minority ethnic people, particularly women, who want to participate in the frontline of our politics.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel