A TWITTER account claiming to belong to a former Yes-supporting Unionist was deleted yesterday after its suspicious content was picked up online.
Tory MSP Murdo Fraser retweeted a post from “ex-SNP voter” Simon Yates, who had claimed “many” former Yessers now back the Union – even though several recent polls have concluded the opposite is true.
“Simon” shared an SNP clip of former No voters explaining why they now support independence, adding: “The notion that this reflects Scottish attitudes is absurd.
An interesting newcomer to Scotpol twitter, a completely genuine ex-SNP voter RTd by Murdo Fraser. pic.twitter.com/XpgVjpM08h
— Mhairi Hunter (@MhairiHunter) June 23, 2020
“Many 2014 ‘Yessers’ up north like myself have switched to ‘No’ due to the certain positive impact that Brexit will have on our local communities.”
(Note to self: Next National Fact Check should definitely take a look at *that* claim.)
SNP councillor Mhairi Hunter formed a top sleuthing team with Leo Miklasz, who spotted that “Simon’s” picture just didn’t look quite right.
It was @leomiklasz who first spotted Simon in the wild. pic.twitter.com/IMcPZuVBo1
— Mhairi Hunter (@MhairiHunter) June 23, 2020
If you’ve ever used a face-blending app, you’ll spot it straight away. There was no chance that was a real person.
There was also the fact that Mr Yates was claiming to live in Caithness – but as many comments pointed out, it’s hardly common lingo for folk there to describe their area as “up north”.
Simon then changed his profile pic. Same guy? Hard to say for sure. pic.twitter.com/SS89R1gwB1
— Mhairi Hunter (@MhairiHunter) June 23, 2020
Robert replied: "’Up North’ is a phrase never uttered by someone who knows Scotland. See also ‘north of the Border.’”
While some called on Hunter to report the account for impersonation, it was already too late.
The attention drummed up by the retweet from Murdo Fraser appeared to have spooked them, and before changing the account image to even more terrifying Photoshopped versions of the original photograph, the account quickly vanished.
We know Tories are desperate to find some Yes-to-No voters to counteract the huge number of people who’ve had the opposite journey … but it might be worth taking a quick look at their Twitter account before highlighting them, next time.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel