MHAIRI Black has challenged Nicola Sturgeon over allegations of transphobia in the SNP after an activist shared their account of an SNP meeting in March.
The MP also issued a call to the party’s Westminster leader Ian Blackford and National Secretary Angus MacLeod.
It came after Teddy Hope – the trans officer of Out For Indy, the official LGBTQ+ wing of the SNP – shared their experiences of being a trans person in the party, specifically focusing on a branch meeting held in Bearsden.
Hope said they have been targeted with transphobic abuse at party events and online.
They wrote: “I lost hope long ago with the party HQ addressing these issues, and after seeing complaints being raised time and time again by trans friends and allies in the SNP regarding rampant transphobia amongst our ranks, and receiving no response, that feeling was justified."
READ MORE: Harry Potter author JK Rowling criticised over ‘transphobic’ tweets
Hope added: “If SNP HQ fails to address any of the several complaints raised with their institution, then headquarters is complicit in normalising a transphobic culture that has abused trans members countless times, and let our voices fall silent.”
Responding to the initial letter, Black urged Sturgeon, Blackford and MacLeod to take action.
She asked the trio directly on Twitter: “Are we going to continue to pretend transphobia isn’t a problem in this party?”
Are we going to continue to pretend transphobia isn’t a problem in this party @NicolaSturgeon @Ianblackford_MP @AonghasMacLeoid? https://t.co/1LK1EPeeSH
— Mhairi Black MP🏳️🌈 (@MhairiBlack) June 29, 2020
Blackford replied: “There cannot be any place for transphobia in the SNP or in society.
“We as a country have come a long way in delivering equality and we must not be diverted from this journey.
"Mutual respect and tolerance must be at the heart of who we are. Yes debate issues openly, but with grace.”
Members of the SNP Women's Pledge Group denied allegations of transphobic abuse at a meeting in Bearsden in March which was mentioned by Hope, saying it appeared "each and every one" of them was "being libelled".
In a statement they said was in response to "mendacious accusations" from Hope, the group wrote: "It is deeply disappointing to see so many senior members in our party accept the contents of the statement [referring to Hope's account of the Bearsden meeting] as fact without due diligence.
READ MORE: Scottish Greens hit out at PM for scrapping plan to make gender change easier
"Officials in our party have tweeted condemning those of us in attendance yet no attempt, as far as we aware, was made to contact the branch to confirm the contents as a true and accurate reflection of the meeting."
They add that they condemn "any and all bigotry aimed at all marginalised groups protected under the Equality Act 2010".
Below is the Women's Pledge group's response to some of the mendacious accusations aimed at party members following a meeting to discuss the implications of the GRA reform proposals. pic.twitter.com/aP7aJ50nZL
— SNP Women's Pledge (@WomensPledge) June 29, 2020
The two accounts of the meeting differ largely. Hope says there were photos of trans people handed out, and their appearance then ridiculed as they were compared to "predators and paedophiles".
The Women's Pledge Group say a "lively discussion" took place but at no point did anyone express any "discomfort at the questions posed". The group said the discussion focused on "the very real impact [the Gender Reform Act] would have on women and girls' rights".
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article