WE hear a lot about so-called “strongman” leaders from around the globe, from Turkey’s President Erdogan’s consolidation of power, to Vladimir Putin’s latest attempt to remain in the Kremlin indefinitely.
However, strongman politics normally refers to a form of autocratic, militarised power, not literal physical strength (Putin’s infamous shirtless horseback ride aside).
This weekend, in a show of fitness guaranteed to impress absolutely nobody at all, Boris Johnson did at least one push-up in front of a fawning photojournalist from the (Daily) Mail on Sunday.
READ MORE: This may be the real reason Boris Johnson told us all about Tim Tams
In a bold retort guaranteed to impress roughly the same number of people, Keir Starmer has said he can do more than that.
Starmer, confident in his ability to do more than one press-up (prime ministerial indeed) and stuttering as charmingly as Bridget Jones’s Mark Darcy, said: “I was thinking this week at PMQs maybe question one should be, maybe, erm you know, first to, first to 50.”
Piers Morgan said he would pay “good money to see that”. We’ve got news for you Piers, we’re already paying to see this.
Call Boris Johnson a clown, don’t boast you cando “50 press ups”, my god: pic.twitter.com/GqqL1YUnLg
— Dawn “Join A Union” Foster (@DawnHFoster) June 29, 2020
Let’s not forget it was only in March this year that MPs got a pay rise of 3.1%, to nearly £82,000 per annum.
Though the price tag is certainly high, why we should expect any different I don’t know.
Two blustering old men desperately trying to out-do each other on the floor of the House of Commons is about as good a description as you could really get of PMQs anyway, so why not make it literal?
READ MORE: BBC bizarrely interviews Nigel Farage about coronavirus
Why not show the whole world how far British politics has fallen, and how essential it is that Scotland gets out?
So yes please, Keir, first to 50 it is.
Which just leaves one question: How many can you do First Minister? Perhaps if you manage 100 they’ll let us have another independence referendum.
Oh for goodness sake... https://t.co/tmx7I9iM0F
— Nicola Sturgeon (@NicolaSturgeon) June 29, 2020
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel