CORPORATIONS could sue for millions over Scotland’s longer route out of lockdown, trade unions say.
Unison, Unite, the RMT and other unions have sounded the warning as part of the Trade Justice Scotland coalition, a 25-strong network that also includes the Common Weal think tank, Women for Independence and Global Justice Now.
It has urged ministers to take action to prevent transnational corporations mounting court challenges for lost profits through the investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) system.
Written into many trade and investment agreements, it allows foreign investors to sue governments in secretive tribunals outwith their national legal system for amounts far higher than are likely to be available to them in domestic courts.
The movement claims cases could arise from actions administrations have taken to save lives, protect jobs and safeguard livelihoods.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon: Coronavirus crisis has made me more resilient than ever
In Peru, the suspension of toll road charging has led to the threat of such action.
Trade Justice Scotland claims Scotland may be at risk due to the way its anti-Covid actions have differed from those in England, with building sites closed earlier and businesses kept shut for longer as part of public health measures. Similar calls have been made by groups in 90 countries
worldwide, with more than 630 organisations including Oxfam and Medecins Sans Frontieres backing the call to guard against such action.
Signatories want Holyrood to act to help end the use of ISDS for good.
Jane Herbstritt of Global Justice Now said Westminster could also be in the frame. She said: “ISDS cases against the Scottish and UK governments after lockdown would mean money that could have been spent investing in public services, adequate incomes for keyworkers, and a green economic recovery would instead go to corporations.
“Many of us have lost income and worse during lockdown because we were abiding by the rules set by the Scottish and UK governments to protect people’s lives.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson's economy plan puts 'Scotland's recovery at risk'
“Why should corporations be able to sue for their lost profits, which could then deny citizens the benefits of public investment that would ensure an equitable economic recovery?
“We urge the First Minister to call for the suspension of ISDS, and ultimately for it to be removed from current and future trade and investment deals negotiated by the UK Government.”
Stephen Smellie of Unison Scotland added: “Global corporations using ISDS to line the pockets of shareholders will be acting against the public interest and hampering us all in addressing the needs of our communities.
“It is therefore essential that steps are taken by the government to prevent this and to protect services.”
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “Scottish Ministers and officials met representatives of Global Justice Now and the Trade Justice Scotland Coalition recently to discuss their concerns over ISDS and other aspects of international trade and investment agreements.
“The Scottish Government’s engagement with the UK Government in the development of future trading arrangements will be informed by these and other discussions.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel