THE unpublished devolution review set up by former PM Theresa May last year lays out a range of recommendations including the appointment of a Union tsar and moving parts of Whitehall to the devolved nations, it has been reported.
According to the Press and Journal, there are 40 recommendations contained in the Dunlop Review – which has been sitting on Boris Johnson’s desk for eight months.
The newspaper reports that the review calls on Johnson to appoint a “very senior Cabinet minister” to oversee the “operational arm” of relations between the UK nations, and send Whitehall policymakers from London to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland to ensure plans consider the differences within the UK.
The review was launched by May before she left office last year, after MPs concluded that relations had “broken down” between the UK and Scottish governments.
Just last week MPs were calling on the UK Government to publish the review – which set out to “strengthen the working of the Union” – and open it up to scrutiny.
READ MORE: MPs demand Michael Gove releases anti-independence blueprint
The Tory chairman of the cross-party Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee wrote to Cabinet Office minister Michael Gove urging him to publish the report, warning the Covid-19 pandemic had raised “serious questions” about the effectiveness of how Westminster and the devolved governments work together on big issues effecting the UK as a whole.
A Westminster source told the Press and Journal that the Dunlop review “suggests policy officials should not cluster in Whitehall and recommends moving them out to the devolved nations to engage directly with stakeholders across the country”.
It adds that the Prime Minister’s self-appointed “minister for the Union” title is not enough, the source said, and warned there needs to be an “operational arm” to relations between the nations.
Additionally, the review reportedly says intergovernmental relations “need to be more of a joint endeavour” – focusing on issues that impact the whole of the UK like climate change and “productivity”.
Since the call for the review last July, polls have indicated there is a growing support for Scottish independence. Last week a Panelbase poll found 54% of Scots now support self-determination, while prior to that a series of surveys found Yes backing was higher than 50%.
The Dunlop report, which was written months ago, will not have taken this into consideration – nor the coronavirus pandemic, which has serious worldwide consequences.
Scotland’s Finance Secretary Kate Forbes has called on the UK Government to devolve further borrowing powers, while the Scottish Government’s own economic recovery advisory group indicated this would be a good move, to help the nation’s pandemic recovery.
The 40 recommendations of the Dunlop report will not take major new developments like this into account.
A spokesperson for the UK Government said: “The Government is grateful for the work that Lord Dunlop has undertaken and is carefully considering his report.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel