NEW data from public health bodies has revealed which towns and cities are most at risk of being put back on lockdown following a row over “pillar two” testing data.
An investigation by the Financial Times this week found while the UK Government published a UK-wide figure for coronavirus cases each day including tests from hospitals and at-home samples, on a subnational level the reported cases only contain hospital tests. This pillar two testing – results from at-home and drive-through tests – has not been made available at a local level in England.
In Leicester a local lockdown was implemented when it emerged that with pillar two test figures included, there had been 944 positive coronavirus tests in the city from June 13-26 – not 80 as previously thought.
READ MORE: Pillar 2: Up to 90% of Covid-19 cases missing from England's data
New data now gives a fuller picture of the areas most at risk of seeing a second spike in coronavirus cases and which could be put back into lockdown to slow the spread of the virus.
The Financial Times has produced a map showing where the virus is most prevalent based on the new data. It found Merthyr Tydfil in Wales has the highest rate with 177 infections per 100,000, largely down to a large outbreak at a meat plant.
The second-highest rate was found in Leicester, where there were 140 infections per 100,000 people.
This map (from @FT) shows the progress we’ve made in Scotland against COVID. But we mustn’t drop our guard. Please keep following the advice on face coverings, avoiding crowded places, cleaning hands, physical distancing and testing/self isolating if you have symptoms. pic.twitter.com/mgGJtBUN6I
— Nicola Sturgeon (@NicolaSturgeon) July 2, 2020
The north of England had some red areas, where there are more than 50 cases per 100,000 people. Areas of concern included Bradford, Barnsley and Rochdale.
However in Scotland, every area included had just 0-5 positive coronavirus cases per 100,000 people.
The First Minister posted an image of the map, saying: “This map (from @FT) shows the progress we’ve made in Scotland against COVID. But we mustn’t drop our guard. Please keep following the advice on face coverings, avoiding crowded places, cleaning hands, physical distancing and testing/self isolating if you have symptoms.”
READ MORE: New Scientist analysis: Scotland's virus fight hampered by England
The graphic comes a day after Boris Johnson claimed there was no such thing as a Scottish Border, in response to comments from Nicola Sturgeon that she would impose restrictions on those coming into Scotland if the public health evidence suggested it was necessary.
Devi Sridhar, global public health expert, has said Scotland is unlikely to eliminate Covid-19 as it aims to without the co-operation of leaders in England.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel