THE Scottish Government has hit back at claims it has been delaying plans to relax travel restrictions, calling them “completely unfounded”.
Transport Minister Grant Shapps appeared to suggest this was the case in the House of Commons yesterday.
The National reported at the weekend that news of the “air bridge” plan had come as a surprise to the Scottish Government when talk of it had arisen in the media.
Nicola Sturgeon criticised the UK Government for failing to consult her ahead of announcing proposed changes to the regime.
On Monday, she said she wanted to “take a bit of time to consider the public health impact” of the plan and the evidence underpinning it. But when SNP transport spokesman Gavin Newlands raised his concerns on aviation workers being “fired and rehired on slashed terms and conditions”, Shapps responded that “fair play” needs to be guaranteed for employees.
READ MORE: Air bridges: Grant Shapps blames Scotland and Wales for delays
He then added: “I would say to the honourable gentleman, I’d appreciate his help in ensuring that air bridges can get going as quickly as possible.
I’m very keen to get the devolved administrations, including the Scottish Government, on board so we can get this thing announced.”
He urged another SNP MP, Philippa Whitford, to “ask the Scottish Government to join with us in ensuring we can have these air bridges in place nationwide as quickly as possible”.
Scotland’s Justice Secretary Humza Yousaf hit back at Shapps’ comments.
“This suggestion is completely unfounded,” he said.
“We have sought, as far as possible, a four-nations approach to this issue, but such a policy requires meaningful consultation by the UK Government – something which has so far been lacking.”
READ MORE: Jacob Rees-Mogg claims Scotland is just a 'district or area'
The First Minister took to Twitter to say that the claims were a “misrepresentation of the position”, adding that it was “disappointing but sadly not surprising”.
Referring to her tweet, Yousaf further called Shapps out, saying: “A complete mispresentation by @grantshapps.
“Despite asking for a call with UK Government all of last week on this issue we were told on Friday night ... the details would be in Saturday’s press.
“Meeting due with UK Government yesterday at 6pm, at 5.30pm they sent through updated list of countries they wanted to announce.
“Original list we considered had 15 countries green and 27 amber risk – with 30 mins notice, [they] asked us to decide upon updated list [of] 40 countries green and 33 amber risk.
“I told them we clearly were not going to agree until our CMO and other advisors could consider updated list.
“There was also an agreement between all four nations that we should revisit the date of any announcement to take into account route map milestones of each nation.”
A Welsh government source said communication with London on the matter had been “patchy”, saying that they are awaiting “confirmation of a planned four-nation ministerial meeting ahead of any announcement being made”
People arriving in the UK – including returning residents – are currently required to self-isolate for a fortnight to reduce the spread of coronavirus.
The UK Government is expected to announce a list of countries which will be exempt from the restrictions this week, but so far details have not been published.
Reports have suggested that as many as 75 countries could be exempted from the quarantine restrictions, based on their Covid-19 situation, when the list is finally published.
According to the Daily Telegraph, the list will lift the Foreign Office ban on non-essential travel to nearly all EU destinations, the British territories including Bermuda and Gibraltar, as well as Turkey, Thailand, Australia and New Zealand.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel