BORIS Johnson’s “contempt” for Scotland is placing the Union in jeopardy and will drive up support for independence, according to Henry McLeish.
He spoke out after the Prime Minister told MPs there was no border between England and Scotland and dismissed as a possible move by Nicola Sturgeon to quarantine visitors from the rest of the UK as ‘shameful” – even if Covid-19 levels rise.
The former first minister described the border comment as the “most provocative” to be made to Scots in 20 years adding it revealed the true belief that the Conservative
Government had about Scotland and devolution.
He added Johnson’s brand of Unionism and “divisive” style of government would result in Scots who had never contemplated independence becoming alienated from Westminster and moving towards the SNP and Yes cause.
“Boris Johnson’s comment that there is no border was a calculated move and is probably the most divisive and provocative statement made about the Union in the last 20 years,” McLeish told The National.
“For the first time it reveals what the Conservative Government thinks of devolution. It has treated Wales and Scotland with contempt.”
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon: Overseas travel changes need proper consideration
He added: “They don’t take devolution seriously, they don’t believe in four nation politics. That is why I believe the dial will shift [on independence].
“It didn’t move a great deal after Brexit but what Johnson has added is an irritant.
“The danger for me is that he moves the debate beyond the Bravehearts and traditional nationalists to other Scots who are not nationalists, but may be sick and tired of the government he is putting forward.
“I would like to see Scotland remain in the Union but not at any price. Johnson may be unintentionally driving people towards independence who are not natural supporters of either the SNP or independence.”
“Johnson and Rees-Mogg are not saving the Union, they are jeopardising the Union by encouraging people to be alienated from Westminster and start thinking positively about independence.”
McLeish spoke out at the end of a week which saw increased tensions between the UK and Scottish Governments over the handling of the pandemic.
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon had indicated she will consider introducing quarantine for people travelling into Scotland if there is a surge in England and Wales.
She insisted any such move would be to protect public health in Scotland and limit the spread of any virus outbreaks.
But in response to a question from Scots Tory MP Andrew Bowie at Prime Minister’s Questions that the quarantining of visitors from across the rest of the UK could have a negative impact on the tourism sector, Johnson said: “I find the suggestion absolutely astonishing and shameful.
“There have been no discussions with the Scottish administration about that, but I point out to my honourable friend what he knows very well – there is no such thing as a border between England and Scotland.”
McLeish said Johnson was using constitutional politics to distract from his failure in handling the coronavirus pandemic which has led to the deaths of more than 44,000 people in the UK and that he was in no position to criticise the Scottish Government.
“Scotland has moved through the pandemic relatively successfully. We don’t know what’s ahead but a reasonable job has been done.
“It is then shocking in view of Johnson’s performance on the pandemic that he should be lecturing to anyone else, especially Wales and Scotland who have been navigating the pandemic much better than the Conservatives,” he said.
“Because of Johnson’s failure to rise to the challenge of the pandemic, this is now a government of distraction. He wants to pick a fight with Scotland as it is a distraction.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel