NORTHERN Ireland First Minister Arlene Foster has said her powersharing partner’s apology after attending a republican funeral “falls short”.
Trust that had been built between members of the Stormont coalition – and Deputy First Minister Michelle O’Neill’s credibility in delivering Covid-19 health messaging – have been damaged by the controversy over large crowds at Bobby Storey’s funeral, the DUP leader said.
Sinn Fein’s O’Neill has stood by her decision to go to this week’s west Belfast service for the senior republican but did say sorry to families bereaved during lockdown for any hurt caused by scenes of hundreds of people lining the route.
Foster said: “Regrettably, the role of the Deputy First Minister in causing that hurt has not been acknowledged today. I think it falls short of that. I regret that that is the case.”
O’Neill is facing calls from the other four parties in the five-party executive at Stormont to stand down from her role as joint head of government pending police and Assembly standards investigations into the scenes on Tuesday.
She and party colleagues have been accused of flouting the Covid-19 regulations and guidance they helped to set.
Storey was a former IRA figure who supported Sinn Fein’s leadership during the peace process.
Foster said she would be speaking further to other party leaders to try to address the controversy.
She added: “It is important that we try and rebuild that trust that has been lost.
“Unfortunately, the credibility of that messaging has been badly damaged over this past week.”
O’Neill insisted she acted within the rules in respect of all the things that were within her control, such as the size of the cortege and the numbers attending inside
St Agnes’ Church. “I will never apologise for attending the funeral of my friend,” she added.
The Sinn Fein vice-president acknowledged some families had been left upset.
“I am also concerned that those grieving families are experiencing more hurt over recent days,” she said. “I am sorry for that.”
O’Neill added: “I would never set out to hurt any family or compound their grief at such a sad time.
“In terms of my attendance at the funeral, I am confident I can stand over the fact I worked within the guidelines and I worked within the regulations in terms of attending a requiem mass, which was allowed, and also to walk in a funeral cortege of up to 30 people.”
The leaders of the five main executive parties at Stormont met yesterday morning in an effort to resolve the row. Outdoor gatherings are restricted to 30 people in Northern Ireland.
O’Neill has insisted Storey’s funeral cortege complied with that rule and the numbers who lined the streets to watch it pass were outside the control of organisers.
Foster re-iterated her demand that the Deputy First Minister step aside while police investigate possible social-distancing breaches at the funeral.
The First Minister said: “There was no recognition of any wrongdoing or recognition that there was a problem, no recognition that the credibility of the [Stormont ministerial] executive has been damaged.
“We need to recognise that there is a problem and try to deal with the problem.”
Ulster Unionist leader Steve Aiken and nationalist SDLP leader Colum Eastwood, who participated in “robust” exchanges between Stormont chiefs yesterday, said O’Neill’s remarks did not go far enough.
They rejected her claim that she stuck to the rules, insisting there were clear breaches.
Under Stormont regulations and guidance still displayed on official websites this week, friends of
the deceased should only attend the funeral if none of the bereaved family members are able to attend the funeral.
Storey’s family did attend Tuesday’s service.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here