THE relationship between the Scottish and UK governments has never been so bad. The events of the past week – and in particular the bogus and manufactured attack over the universally accepted public health need to quarantine contiguous areas during virus outbreaks – simply illustrate that point.
But it is going to get even worse if the UK Government persists in bringing forward proposals to further undermine devolution, which it is now briefing journalists that it intends to do.
I won’t go into the details of what I hope will be widely reported elsewhere today, but no-one should be in any doubt that the current Scottish Government will refuse to accept any external supervisory role over our legislation in devolved areas and will not operate any system that forces us to accept lower standards than those we presently enjoy.
But as well as understanding the what of this deepening constitutional crisis, we should also try to understand the why – namely why do they show such hostility to Scotland?
READ MORE: This may be the real reason Boris Johnson told us all about Tim Tams
One part of the explanation lies in the nature of current UK politics and the inexperience of those in it. Both the Tory and Labour parties have accepted Brexit and don’t care that we rejected it. Both subscribe to an exceptionalist stance which contends that all decisions must be taken by what they call their “sovereign” Parliament.
Most MPs from those parties hold the supremacy of the UK Government over the devolved governments as a political fact even though it isn’t. But they only do so because they are entirely ignorant of both the theory and the practice of devolution – and of its history.
I gave evidence to the House of Commons Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee last week. The majority of members of that committee had been in politics for less than a decade and the only two who had actual experience of devolution were David Jones from Wales – who hates the very idea – and our own David Mundell, who hates the SNP. So most members of the committee, like most MPs, neither understand why devolution exists, nor the fact that it is not synonymous with the SNP.
They are clearly unsettled and upset by Scotland and Wales and Northern Ireland devising and implementing their own policies in key areas, like handling the current pandemic, and refusing to be bound by what Westminster thinks or decides.
To them this is against the natural order of things. They don’t know why it is permitted and they would like to get rid of it in order that the so-called “Mother of Parliaments” can rule supreme again, as they think it always has and always should.
READ MORE: Pete Wishart: Boris Johnson is Yes campaign's 'best recruiting sergeant'
That is threatening enough, but it is compounded by a new element which is asserting itself.
Taking forward the Johnson project, if the mish-mash of arrogance, half-baked notions and sleekit opportunism can be dignified with that name, requires a level of overconfidence that can only be gained on the playing fields of Eton. But for that shaky delusion to survive it needs to be fed with constant reassurance of superiority and an absolute belief in the right to rule.
Yet such a stance now looks distinctly daft given the Prime Minister’s abysmal performance in his first year in office.
So the sycophants who surround Johnson must constantly reassure him and themselves with as much sneering and dismissal of lesser beings, and parliaments, as they can mange.
No wonder, therefore, that they see as unforgivable Scotland’s regular demolition of their patronising and nonsensical position, not in any dramatic way but merely by the quiet competence of our First Minister and the level of support that her Government commands. It is all in stark contrast to their plight and a resounding regular slap in their faces.
READ MORE: Dominic Cummings under fire after top civil servant ousted by No 10
They cannot bear it and that is why there are ever more frantic efforts by the UK Government to attack and discredit what is happening north of a very obvious border.
Fortunately there is, as usual, a Scottish proverb that puts it well. Because “the mair they talk, the better we’re kent” though in this case it is also true that the mair they talk, the mair their words and arguments are revealed as the tawdry, self-interested, self-promoting hollow rubbish that they are.
It will, alas, get worse before it gets better. But the louder and shriller Johnson or Rees-Mogg or any of them become, the more outlandish their statements and the more preposterous their lies are seen to be – and the more independence becomes inevitable.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel