ONCE upon a different time I had this notice tacked to my office door: “Just because you’re paranoid, doesn’t mean they’re not out to get you.” The Government in London would have you believe that Scottish concerns about emasculating Holyrood is no more than tartan paranoia.
Merely “confecting” another political grievance.
Let us examine this “grievance”. The plans are to make a UK internal market a legal entity post-Brexit, when we are all finally dragged out of the European single market. Under which new law any legislation Holyrood intended to pass would be subject to a test as to its impact on the UK market. And, just in case you miss the point about whose market is it anyway, there will be an unelected, oversight body to get us telt what we can and can’t legislate on.
A parliament that can’t pass its own laws, a parliament which is subject to unsolicited external scrutiny, is no longer a parliament. Which is, of course, the point of all this. The architect of this smash and grab is one Michael Gove, a nominal Scot for whom the term sleekit might have been invented.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson just flushed £400m down the drain on this vanity project
The direction of current polling, not just in terms of the increasing appetite for independence, but in the widening gulf between how electors view the FM and the PM, has got not a few Tories a mite rattled.
They console themselves with the thought that an 80-strong majority and a four-year stretch till the next UK election gives them ample
time to rid themselves of this troublesome Parliament in Scotland.
If anything has been “confected” of late it’s the nonsensical suggestion about there being no Scotland/England border. You might have thought this a typically blustering throwaway line from a Prime Minister increasingly drowning, not waving at his weekly question time. Then along came the ever more ludicrous Jacob Rees-Mogg to repeat the calumny and, as the Yanks say, double down on it.
Now, JR-M knows a fair bit about borders. He knows that if you move your operations from London to Dublin you get to stay in the EU with all the fiscal benefits thereof. He knows if you also headquarter offshore, his very tidy profits are outwith the grasp of the UK taxman. The Leader of the House of Commons wouldn’t recognise a scruple if it leapt up and bit him on his pinstriped bum.
All this Border brouhaha is merely a prelude to dismantling the powers of any legislature liable to interfere with whatever shoddy trade deal Westminster cooks up from next January. Imagine, if you will, pinning your hopes on doing a profitable deal with The Donald, a man with a whim of iron.
Or let’s suppose the US has a late attack of common sense and chucks Trump out.
Do not think for a nanosecond that Uncle Jo Biden will be a septuagenarian pushover.
READ MORE: Joanna Cherry calls for SNP debate on how to secure indyref2
The powerful farming and pharmaceutical lobbies, to name but two, have already cast greedy eyes across the pond. We hear a lot about the dangers of chlorinated chicken, hormone-boosted beef, etc. Let’s not forget that behind those dubious products – which cause massively more sickness – lie the kind of appalling animal welfare standards which the EU fought so hard against.
We don’t want or need to revert to battery hens, jumbo indoor cattle factory “farms”, crated calves, and imprisoned pigs.
Yet if we allow unfettered access to our marketplace from the US not only will it impact on human and animal wellbeing, it will undercut our own farmers.
In a post-Brexit, post-Covid economic landscape too many consumers will be in no position to be fussy if the price is right. Meanwhile, Big Pharma has made no bones about wanting to get its mitts on NHS contracts, thus inflating the price our already strapped health care sector pays for essential drugs.
Make no mistake, this is crunch time for our 21-year-old Parliament. If we cannot protect it from this naked attempt to put it out of any meaningful business, then the game is well and truly a bogey.
So what to do? For starters we have to nail the lie that Scotland is not a sovereign nation in its own right. People are wont to point to the original Scotland Act as evidence that the constitutional buck stops in Westminster. The bit of that early legislation about which they have selective amnesia is that it declared every area bar defence, foreign affairs and macro economics was devolved to Holyrood. It slips their minds, too, that any Commons legislation which would impact on devolved matters had to be ratified by Holyrood before it held sway in Scotland.
READ MORE: Wee Ginger Dug: What the newest poll for Yes is telling us
Gove has been trying to chip away at the very foundation stones of this settlement for a very long time. Remember his wheeze about wanting to bypass Holyrood and directly fund in already devolved areas? Remember his wanting to make sure this had a Made in London label attached?
And let’s not forget all those empty promises about protecting farmers and animal welfare standards.
As I say, sleekit to a fault.
We have to recognise that we are in an existential end game here whose importance and dangers have been masked by the urgent need to deal with the pandemic. The suggestion that the Scottish Government is trying to drive a wedge between itself and London is the polar opposite of what is actually happening in less than plain sight.
That Gove and Co are little more than a wrecking crew is only too obvious from the way they’ve botched and sabotaged the Brexit negotiations. What is less well understood is that they want to shaft Scotland too.
Witness how they first bought off, and then royally screwed the Northern Ireland administration. NI chose to cosy up to the Tory government and got swallowed by it. There is now a border in the middle of the Irish Sea which the PM repeatedly declared was a fantasy. Fake news.
There is little point in having a steady 54% of Scots with an appetite for independence if we have a gelded Parliament incapable of pressing home the case for it.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel