A TORY minister has sparked yet more uncertainty in England about face mask rules after declaring he would "perhaps" support making them mandatory when in public.
Justice Secretary Robert Buckland also confused matters further when urged to explain why Home Secretary Priti Patel had taken her face mask off during a meeting with her French counterpart.
Earlier this morning, Buckland was asked on BBC Radio 4's Today programme whether he was in the "mandatory perhaps" or "mandatory never" camp in terms of insisting people don face coverings. He replied: "I think I'm 'mandatory perhaps'."
On Friday, Prime Minister Boris Johnson hinted non-surgical masks could become compulsory in English shops, saying he wanted to be "stricter" on insisting people wear them. But Cabinet Office minister Michael Gove said yesterday it was "best to trust people's common sense" rather than force them to adopt face coverings.
READ MORE: Michael Gove: English good manners mean face mask laws aren't required
Quizzed on the different responses and whether they signalled a split in opinion at the top of Government, Buckland told the BBC: "He [Gove] took the view as he was answering the question that he thought we should encourage good sense – I agree with that.
"If it becomes necessary to nudge people further by taking further action then of course we will consider that. I think the matter is under careful and daily review."
Later on Sky News, Kay Burley asked the minister about Patel, who had been pictured with a mask on as she met French Interior Minister Gerald Darmanin in Calais. However, a photo taken when the pair were inside showed they had taken their coverings off.
Priti Patel met her French counterpart with a mask, outside. And then it was removed inside. No wonder people are confused. 😷 pic.twitter.com/OJWiwuRAtL
— Alistair Bunkall (@AliBunkallSKY) July 12, 2020
Buckland, who had told Burley he wears face masks in enclosed spaces, explained Patel’s decision by saying “people are still learning how to use face masks”.
Labour have demanded "clarity" on the Government's position and has requested that Health Secretary Matt Hancock come to the Commons on Monday to provide Parliament with a "clear message".
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon praises Scots for wearing face masks in shops
Shadow health minister Justin Madders told BBC Radio 4's Westminster Hour: "We need Matt Hancock to come to the House and say this is what the science says, this is what we believe you should be doing and then let's move on.
"Have a clear message and we all know where we stand."
The call for ministers to make face coverings mandatory in shops in England has been growing following First Minister Nicola Sturgeon's decision to change the rule in Scotland as of Friday.
Dr Venki Ramakrishnan, president of the Royal Society, told Good Morning Britain that the evidence on face coverings had "shifted".
The Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) member said: "It's (evidence) now quite strongly in favour of using face coverings in enclosed spaces where we're likely to come into contact with strangers.
"I think that the Government should be very clear. It's not consistent to make it mandatory on public transport and not make it mandatory in other enclosed and busy public spaces because the behaviour of the virus is the same in all of these spaces."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel