FASHION brand Quiz has said it believes that one of its suppliers based in Leicester has used a subcontractor at the centre of allegations over breaches to the national living wage.
The Glasgow-based brand said it is “extremely concerned” by a report in the Times over the weekend that its clothes are being made in a factory where prospective staff are being paid as little as £3 an hour.
The company said it is looking into the issue, just a week after similar allegations took more than a third off the share price of Boohoo.
“The group is currently investigating the reported allegations, which, if found to be accurate, are totally unacceptable,” Quiz said in a statement yesterday.
An undercover reporter for the Times said she had been told by factory bosses that she would need to work unpaid for two days before getting a job that would pay between £3 and £4 an hour. The living wage is £8.72 for someone over the age of 25.
“From our initial review, we believe that one of Quiz’s suppliers based in Leicester has used a subcontractor in direct contravention of a previous instruction from Quiz,” the fashion brand said.
“It is this subcontractor that is subject of the national living wage complaint. Quiz has immediately suspended activity with the supplier in question pending further investigation.”
Quiz said it “is very grateful to the press for highlighting these alleged breaches.”
Quiz runs more than 70 of its own stores across the UK, and has 174 concessions at department stores. It employs more than 1500 people in the UK and Ireland.
Quiz said it would terminate its relationships with suppliers that do not live up to its code of practice.
Chief executive Tarak Ramzan said: “We are extremely concerned and disappointed to be informed of the alleged breach of national living wage requirements in a factory making Quiz products. The alleged breaches to both the law and Quiz’s ethical code of practice are totally unacceptable.
“We are thoroughly investigating this incident and will also conduct a fuller review of our supplier auditing processes to ensure that they are robust. We will update our stakeholders in due course.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here