PLANS to make face coverings mandatory in shops in England have provoked an angry reaction among right-wing commentators online, who have resorted to calling masks “muzzles” in response.
The UK Government followed in Scotland’s footsteps this week when they announced that from July 24 it will be compulsory to wear a face covering in stores to help prevent the spread of Covid-19.
Earlier in the pandemic, members of the public were told they did not need to wear face coverings in public – however health experts around the world now say the evidence shows masks can prevent the virus spreading, so the more people wearing them the better.
Evidence has been found to show face coverings protect others from catching the virus from the person wearing one. However, studies show social distancing measures should be followed along with mask wearing.
READ MORE: Police Scotland issue no fines to people breaking rules on masks
Commentator Isabel Oakeshott reacted angrily as it emerged face coverings would be mandatory in England after days of UK Government dithering.
She wrote online: “Muzzles should be voluntary, not mandatory. Another sinister encroachment of the state!
“Michael Gove was right – keep the law out of it; and let people exercise their common sense.”
Another conservative commentator, Esther K, repeated the sentiment and added she does “not care” about the virus, which she branded “Kung flu”.
She wrote: “I simply do not care about the Kung flu. I'm sick of hearing about it. I'm tired of our incompetent government trying to force us to wear muzzles. I'm fed up with the same virtue signalling twats that went out to protest disturbing me about masks. I Just. Don't. Care.”
Journalist Peter Hitchens also posted numerous tweets calling masks “muzzles”.
Meanwhile in Scotland it emerged the police did not have to issue any fines to people ignoring guidance on face coverings over the weekend.
On Friday, it became mandatory to wear coverings in Scotland’s shops. It was already compulsory on public transport.
The First Minister said there had been evidence of “extremely high” compliance with the new rules.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel