THE former SNP MSP at the heart of the new Alliance For Independence (AFI) has defended his new party against accusations he’s putting indyref2 at risk.
Dave Thompson told The National he believed the new movement could help create a “supermajority” in Holyrood at the expense of the Tories, Labour and the Lib Dems.
He also explained that AFI candidates would be a mixture of independent independence supporters and members drawn from the small parties who sign up to the alliance.
The ballot paper will simply read Alliance For Independence – Max The Yes.
Anyone elected would, in effect, be unwhipped and allowed to vote with their conscience on all issues apart from independence.
READ MORE: Ex SNP MSP to quit and form new pro-independence party
The AFI is due to launch formally at some point in the next ten days, and will have a conference in September to elect office bearers.
The group’s national executive will be made up of two voting delegates from each of the eight regions, the seven office bearers, and two voting delegates from any other party that comes on board.
Thompson told The National he’d had "tentative" discussions with other parties and was keen for them to get involved. He said: “We’re not dictating to anybody, we’re not telling folks, ‘this is our party, you must come and join us’. We’re saying join the alliance, and create this party with us. Get involved, get a voting delegate place, come to the conference, and influence how we operate.”
He added: “That wouldn’t change, of course, our basic set up which is that we only have one strong policy, that is independence and keeping the indy government in power to deliver independence.
“And on everything else, small parties that join us and stand under our umbrella, they can run with the rest of their programmes to their heart’s content. And individuals who we will select in the regions as well – small parties won’t get all the places obviously, they’ll just get a number of them – we’ll be selecting a lot of individuals, and they will, as long as they back independence and the local regional group’s happy with them and their programme, they can follow their own conscience and their own programmes.
READ MORE: John Curtice: AFI risks 'destroying unity of nationalist movement'
“So, if you imagine a parliament, with a number of small indy parties getting in through the Alliance but also with maybe I don’t know 16 or 20 Margo McDonalds all being champions of their own regions and issues that are close to their own hearts.”
Asked if AFI would take a stance on some of the big issues which could face MSPs in the next term, including possibly, plans to reform the Gender Recognition Act, Thompson said it would be up to elected members to decide how they vote.
He said: “That’s the beauty of not deciding policy issues in relation to these matters because if we get a number of folk elected into the parliament, and if some of them are pro abortion, some are against abortion, some are pro-GRA and some are against GRA, that’s fine.
“As far as we’re concerned that’ll lend itself to healthy debate in the parliament.”
Thomson’s announcement yesterday was criticised by some of his former colleagues.
Michael Russell told the BBC: “I know Dave very well, I’ve worked very well with him.
“I think he’s mistaken in his analysis. I believe that in order to get independence we need a unified movement.
“The SNP is the key part, or a key part, of that movement. I’ve been a member of the SNP now for 40 years and I’m certainly not changing my view.”
But Thompson said that if “one person in four out of the million that voted SNP in 2016” backed the AFI, they’d get 16 seats.
“The votes of these folk, these independence supporter those who desperately want independence, will be of no use, they’ll be wasted if they’re used to support the SNP on the list.”
He said every seat taken by the AFI would dislodge a unionist.
Thompson was coy on who else was involved in the alliance. he said they’d had “tentative expressions of interest from a couple of smaller parties”
Asked if Tommy Sheridan’s Solidarity would be welcome in the alliance – given the opposition to him from other parties – Thomson said they would be “just as welcome, as the SSP as the Independence for Scotland Party, and as the Greens.”
He said AFI would be an “umbrella” for the “Yes family”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel