THE UK Government’s multi-billion pound procurement of personal protective equipment during the Covid-19 pandemic should be investigated by the spending watchdog, Labour have said.
The party have written to the National Audit Office calling on it to look into the number of contracts awarded without competition under emergency powers earlier this year, HuffPost UK reported.
Chancellor Rishi Sunak revealed last week that £15 billion was allocated by the Treasury to spend on PPE during the pandemic. The Cabinet Office picked the consulting firm Deloitte to advise on how to source the kit, including masks, gowns and gloves, for health workers.
As demand for these items soared around the world, UK ministers used a system bypassing usual rules on the need for rival bidders to secure the products.
The single bidder emergency procurement process was used more than 60 times between April and May, and not all of the contracts included have been made public.
It’s unclear exactly how much has been spent on the contracts, but officials wrote to Good Law Project director Jo Maugham suggesting the figure could be around £5.5 billion.
Rachel Reeves, the shadow Cabinet Office minister and Justin Madders, shadow health minister, called on the National Audit Office (NAO) chief Gareth Davies to investigate, highlighting how many emergency tenders were used when compared to other European states.
The shadow cabinet members wrote that contracts for the PPE were given to firms with little – and sometimes no – prior experience in the sector.
Reeves said: “Transparency in the awarding of public contracts is crucial to good government. The public don’t expect emergency laws to be used inappropriately and have raised questions about a number of contracts which deserve scrutiny.
“Ministers should welcome the independent oversight an NAU investigation can provide.”
Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove said he would “absolutely” back the NAO looking into his government’s process.
A UK Government spokesperson said: “We have delivered more than two billion items of PPE since the pandemic began. We have a robust process which ensures that orders are of high-quality standard, meet commercial due diligence and checked for risk and fraud.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel