THE UK Government has adopted an “almost colonial” mindset in its approach to Scotland, according to a leading political commentator.
In a scathing critique of Boris Johnson, Financial Times editor at large Robert Shrimsley warns the dissolution of the Union could well be the Prime Minister’s ultimate legacy.
The newspaper’s chief UK political commentator adds that Unionists are “very pessimistic” about the chances of preventing Scottish independence.
Shocked into action by recent polls which show majority support for a Yes vote, the PM is planning several trips to Scotland to promote the Union.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon not told about Boris Johnson's planned visit
But Shrimsley writes: “As long as the UK has Mr Johnson, the nationalists have a chance.
“He is now discussing a Scottish tour but this might go down as well as a royal progress by the conquering knights of Edward I. Mr Johnson is, in the words of one Unionist, ‘irredeemably toxic to Scots.’”
UK Government ministers are to hold an emergency meeting to discuss plans to curb increasing support for independence, which Shrimsley says has offered at least some hope to disheartened Better Together backers.
A leading Unionist told him: “I am very pessimistic. The only real grounds for optimism is that people in London are now very worried and that the cabinet office is getting engaged.” Another added: “London has now seen what they are dealing with. The SNP are not the Liberal Democrats.”
Michael Gove, reportedly put into “panic mode” by the recent polls, is said to be accelerating review of intergovernmental relations. Shrimsley writes that this is long ovderdue, adding: “UK dealings with the devolved administrations are characterised by an almost colonial mindset and need a rethink.”
A former Downing Street staffer told him that the problem extended beyond Downing Street. “This is not just about politicians,” they said. “Whitehall also too often treats the first ministers of Scotland and Wales like regional mayors rather than the leaders of countries.”
READ MORE: Boris Johnson rules out second independence referendum ... again
Taking aim at Johnson, the FT commentator concludes: “If Scotland goes, it will be a calamity he has largely visited upon himself. And history will not be kind.”
Downing Street reaffirmed its opposition to a second independence referendum yesterday when the PM’s spokesman was quizzed over reports of panic among the Cabinet about the increasingly likely prospect of a Yes vote.
He said: "It was in 2014 that the Scottish people voted to keep our United Kingdom together. Both sides committed to respecting that decision, and the First Minister promised it would be a once in a generation vote. The UK Government will continue to uphold the decisive verdict from the referendum."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel