OFFENDERS who have been ordered to carry out unpaid work in the community could have the number of hours they are required to do cut as a consequence of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Justice Secretary Humza Yousaf is considering the move after Social Work Scotland (SWS) warned there is a “major risk” the system could be “overwhelmed”.
It said it will “not be possible” for the 700,000 hours of unpaid work that is outstanding to be completed within the next 12 months.
“There is a major risk that Justice Social Work (JSW) will be overwhelmed, with serious consequences for the wider justice system,” it stated.
As many as 450,000 of the 700,000 outstanding hours could go uncompleted, SWS estimates.
With the Scottish Government having already released some prisoners early as a result of the pandemic, Yousaf told MSPs on the Justice Committee he is considering if the number of hours criminals have been ordered to do will need to reduced on a “proportionate and limited basis”.
READ MORE: Deprived Scots are three times more likely to go to prison
He explained it may be necessary to “reduce the volume of outstanding unpaid work hours in order to ensure that the justice system can continue to operate efficiently and effectively”.
But he stressed: “Should this be necessary, a careful balance will need to be struck so that victims of crime, the wider public and the judiciary continue to be confident that community orders are an effective way for individuals to payback to their communities, while taking into account the challenges faced by JSW and the wider justice system.”
If unpaid work hours are cut, regulations will need to be laid in the Scottish Parliament after recess, Yousaf said.
SWS had written to the Justice Secretary to raise concerns about the impact of the pandemic on unpaid work – a key part of many community payback orders (CPOs).
James Maybee of SWS said there is “an urgent need to proactively address the pressures faced by local authority justice social work services in managing the unpaid work or other activity requirements” and that “action must be quickly taken to reduce the backlog in unpaid work hours”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here