MORE than half of Brits think Nicola Sturgeon has handled the coronavirus crisis better than Boris Johnson.
A YouGov poll that surveyed 4000 people across the UK found 52% think Scotland has handled the pandemic better. Only 10% backed England and 24% said it has been handled the same.
While all the countries in the UK initially had a “four nations” response to the virus and went into lockdown on March 23, there has been divergence since.
Remain voters were the most likely to say Scotland has handled the pandemic best, with 70% of them saying so, compared to 34% of Leave voters.
Only 20% of Tory voters said England had dealt with coronavirus better than Scotland, with 26% backing the FM's approach.
Labour voters were most likely to support the Scottish Government, with 76% saying Sturgeon is doing a good job, followed by 69% of LibDem supporters.
READ MORE: Tom Devine: PM's visit shows fear FM has behaved more capably in pandemic
More than three-quarters of Scots (76%) backed Sturgeon's approach, followed by 57% of Londoners, 51% of those in South England, 47% of those in the Midlands and Wales and 44% of those in the North of England.
Younger members of the electorate (18 to 24-year-olds) were most likely to back Sturgeon at 52%, followed by 56% of 25 to 49-year-olds. This is compared to 43% of those above the age of 65.
A similar trend can be seen for England, with only 6% and 8% of 18-24 and 25 to 49-year-olds supporting Johnson's strategy, compared to 13% of over-65s.
Brits on who has handled the coronavirus outbreak better between England and Scotland:
— YouGov (@YouGov) July 23, 2020
🏴: 10%
🏴: 52 %
Both handled the same: 24% https://t.co/D8D286o2Kh pic.twitter.com/Vlye6N0mOm
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel