THE Scottish Government’s proposed hate crime legislation has been targeted by a well-funded conservative fundamentalist evangelical organisation, described as a “hate group” by an American civil rights organisation.
The Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) – formed by more than 30 Christian leaders to defend religious freedom – has long disputed the designation by the Southern Poverty Law Centre. It is a group with controversial opinions on gay rights.
One of the founders, Alan Sears, co-wrote a book first published in 2003, which is still available, called The Homosexual Agenda: Exposing The Principal Threat To Religious Freedom Today. It claims that LGBTQ people are more likely to engage in paedophilia.
The group has previously campaigned in favour of a law in Belize making gay sex punishable by 10 years’ imprisonment.
It has been staunch in its criticism of the Scottish Government’s Hate Crime Bill, comparing it to laws in countries that are “kind of totalitarian, that don’t enjoy democracy like we do”.
The SNP MSP Tom Arthur tweeted: “Hate crime proposals must be subject to robust debate. However it would be naive to assume that some raising concerns, nominally on the issue of freedom of expression, may not have other agendas.”
ADF told The National: “We reject the tweeted accusations of MSP Thomas Arthur and encourage further debate on the proposed Scottish Hate Crime Bill.
“In a democratic society, ideas must be discussed and countered with more ideas rather than excluding those with whom you disagree from the debate. Labelling those you disagree with as ‘hateful’ simply shuts off debate – this follows the same logic as the Hate Crime Bill which would go so far as to criminalise them.”
A number of groups have concerns over the new legislation, particularly the plan to make “stirring up of hatred” extend to all characteristics, including race, religion, disability, sexual orientation and transgender status.
Under these proposals, a person will commit a crime if they communicate “threatening, abusive or insulting material” which could stir up hatred.
Holyrood Justice Committee’s consultation on the proposed law change closed yesterday.
In its submission the Law Society of Scotland expressed fears that “the bill presents a significant threat to freedom of expression, with the potential for what may be abusive or insulting to become criminalised”.
Taking to Twitter, Humza Yousaf said: “The bill will not prevent you expressing controversial or offensive views. Just don’t do it in a threatening or abusive way that is likely or intended to stir up hatred.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel