THE Scottish Greens have published a list which they say reveals the schools in Scotland most likely to be disadvantaged by a “secret and unfair” grading system put in place after this year’s exams were cancelled due to the coronavirus.
Exams body the Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) asked teachers to submit estimated grades for their pupils, which officials will then moderate based on criteria including a school’s historical exam results.
The Greens say they have been joined by education experts in warning this could see pupils’ grades lowered for no other reason than where they live, deepening existing inequalities in education.
The SQA described the Greens’ analysis as “speculative and unhelpful”.
The party say grades awarded by teachers, based on coursework, will apparently be adjusted by the SQA based on a statistical average, “undermining the work of young people”.
Education spokesperson Ross Greer says he has pushed the agency to reveal its methodology and results of an equalities impact assessment, but this will only happen when pupils get their results. The Greens say pupils in schools that have seen the biggest recent improvement in results are at risk of having their grades affected by historical results.
Their research shows the following schools have seen a rise in passes of five or more Highers of around 20% since 2015/16 – Whitehill Secondary in Glasgow; Mallaig High; West Calder High and St Kentigern’s in West Lothian; Holy Cross High in South Lanarkshire; and Dunblane High.
Greer said: “These schools have worked hard to improve opportunities for their pupils, but this could be seriously undermined by a secret SQA system which reduces the hard work of young people to a statistical average and postcode lottery.
“This secret system ingrains inequality by marking down those who already face adversity, no matter how hard they have worked. Teachers won’t be informed if grades are changed, never mind be given the chance to discuss this. The agency must publish its methodology and the legally required Equality Impact Assessment now.”
A spokesman for the SQA said: “This is an unprecedented year and we have worked hard with schools and colleges to ensure young people get the results they deserve. This analysis is speculative and unhelpful, particularly to young people who are awaiting their results.
“We have been quite clear we will publish our full methodology and Equalities Impact Assessment on results day, the day we would normally publish information about our awarding processes.
“We have said all along that fairness to learners, while maintaining the integrity and credibility of our qualifications system, is at the heart of our approach A free appeals service will be available if schools and colleges do not think awarded grades reflect performances.”
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “We recognise that waiting for results is an anxious time for learners and that will not be helped by claims based on speculation. The certification model SQA has developed will allow the hard work of learners to be recognised.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel