THE SNP have hit out at the decision to ask judges to solve the Brexit power grab row, saying it shows a “total disregard” for devolved nations.
The Westminster Government has sparked fury over plans to create powers over a UK “internal market” following Brexit which would force Scotland and Wales to accept any standards agreed in future trade deals.
The devolved governments and opposition MPs have asked Business Secretary Alok Sharma to set up a dispute resolution panel to discuss such disagreements.
But when asked four times to commit to the panel in the Commons on July 16, Sharma claimed his proposals would see a “power surge” for devolved governments.
Yesterday Tory MP Martin Callanan confirmed that judges will be asked to solve the power grab.
He told Plaid Cymru’s Lord Wigley: “I hope there won’t be any disputes, but if there were they would be legal disputes and the correct forum for resolving legal disputes is through the court system.
“We have no intention of setting up an alternative dispute resolution procedure when we have one of the best and most efficient court systems in the world to resolve disputes.”
There is concern over the fine print however, which makes clear that London will have the ultimate say on standards - as spelled out here: https://t.co/GqPhXMflQx
— Dan O'Donoghue (@MrDanDonoghue) July 29, 2020
The UK has previously not had an internal market defined in law, as it followed the rules of the European Union internal market law – designed to ensure free movement of goods, services, capital and workers.
At the heart of the new UK “internal market” is a “mutual recognition” mechanism. This would see regulations in one part of the UK recognised in all the other nations.
That terrifies ministers in Edinburgh who believe that regime could ultimately lead to lower standards in food safety and environmental protections being imposed in Scotland.
READ MORE: Ex-SNP MEP Heather Anderson urges Scots to have say on UK internal market
Kirsten Oswald, the SNP’s Westminster Deputy leader, said she fears the plans will allow Holyrood to be “overridden” on decisions about devolved issues such as food and agriculture.
“The confirmation — through the unelected House of Lords — that the UK Government has no intention of meaningfully engaging with the devolved governments for an agreed dispute resolution system, is yet another sign of the Tories total disregard for the devolved nations,” she added.
“The Tory Government has opened the door for companies with deep pockets to challenge Holyrood legislation if we try to maintain higher standards than Westminster post-Brexit – putting at risk our key industries with the threat of the imposition of lower standard goods and produce."
SNP’s @kirstenoswald has now responded, says the decision to involve courts shows a ‘total disregard’ for devolved nations https://t.co/lpozJZl8aQ pic.twitter.com/LmGIMrgfIY
— Dan O'Donoghue (@MrDanDonoghue) July 29, 2020
She continued: “Far from strengthening the devolved nations, the UK Government’s internal market plans will enable the decisions of the Scottish Government to be overridden over devolved areas such as food and agriculture in Scotland.”
“The UK Government says it wants to take back control from the EU. It is now clear it wants to take back control from Scotland too.”
READ MORE: Furious Scottish Greens hit out at UK Brexit power grab plans
Michael Russell is expected to make a statement to Holyrood today about the issue.
He said: “The UK Government says it wants to take back control from the EU. It is now clear it wants to take back control from Scotland too.
“Companies with deep pockets will be likely to try to challenge any Scottish Parliament law they say impedes their ability to trade across the UK. And it will mean the UK Parliament effectively imposing standards in devolved policy areas regardless of the wishes of the people of Scotland and laws passed by the Scottish Parliament”, he added.
“We know the UK Government is desperate to do a trade deal with the US – including opening up our market to US agricultural products – threatening our valued and hard-won reputation for the highest quality food standards and produce.
“Under these proposals Scotland will be forced to accept any standards set and agreed by Westminster.
“This proposal is bad for consumers, bad for businesses and agriculture, and disastrous for devolution.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel