IF you’re a connoisseur of political assassinations, you’ve got to admit it was neatly done. Bye bye, Old Yeller. The golden Labrador was led solemnly out into the backyard one last time. Jackson Carlaw said it was a “painful conclusion” to demit the Scottish Tory leadership. If it felt painful – then it looked excruciating. Back in January, he boasted that he’d “spent the last 18 months taking on Nicola Sturgeon. I am asking you now to let me spend the next 18 months taking her down.” The Scottish Tories didn’t even grant him six. Politics can be a rough trade.
The footage from the media interviews which followed looked like an over-colourised reel from the Moscow show trials. Red faced and glassy-eyed, the fallen comrade is forced to read out the confession fraternally prepared for them by their assassins, accepting that their public humiliation is entirely merited. “I am not, in the present circumstances, the person best placed to lead that case over these next vital months in Scottish politics prior to the Holyrood elections,” he said. The party needs a “younger and fresher voice”.
And that’s only the beginning of the hypocrisy and the crocodile tears, as the friends and colleagues who have been working at your destruction behind the scenes take solemnly to the airwaves to commend a “tremendous servant” for the “dignity” of his resignation. Carlaw’s enforced retirement came with no carriage clock and no hand-written letter from the chairman of the board. All the gags I’d saved up for the 2021 Holyrood election campaign suddenly became redundant. We’re both bereft.
READ MORE: Douglas Ross: Who is the Tory MP rumoured to replace Jackson Carlaw?
PJ O’Rourke argues that, all things being equal, “age and guile beat youth, innocence, and a bad haircut”. The Scottish Tories have taken a different view. Within minutes of Carlaw being unsentimentally tumbled into a taxi, bag and baggage, the 37-year-old
Moray MP Douglas Ross was being anointed as the heir presumptive. The political calculations behind this vision of Ross as the great white hope are baffling – and testament to the degree of panic seemingly gripping Holyrood’s largest opposition party.
According to Ross, his “first act on Thursday evening after Jackson Carlaw honourably announced his resignation was to speak to Ruth Davidson and ask her to support me in my plans”. If this is a timeline you can believe in – I can only commend your gullibility. You don’t force Jackson to choke out an endorsement for a “younger and fresher voice” without already having the identity of that voice firmly in mind. The magic plan seems to be that Davidson will do a final burst of spadework for Ross in Holyrood – and trailing clouds of glory, the Moray MP will reappear in the chamber after the election, having seen off the risk of an SNP majority on a clear platform for independence, and the constitutional crisis that outcome is certain to generate.
Scraping through Ross’s political record doesn’t exactly yield up a clear picture of the political pre-occupations and outlook of the chosen one. A lapsed Liberal Democrat with a background in the Scottish Agricultural College, Ross was 10 years in his local council. During his short stint in the Scottish Parliament, he made no real contributions of note, before leaping at the opportunity of a Westminster seat. A Remain voter now reconciled to Brexit, he was congenial enough to Boris Johnson to find a warm corner in his government, and found Dominic Cummings’s visually impaired safari around the north east of England uncongenial enough to resign his post as the Under-Secretary of State for Scotland earlier this year.
On policy, he tells us he wants “to show clearly to everyone in Scotland, no matter where they live or who they are, that if they want to move on from the divisions of the past and focus on the issues that really matter – a strong economy, good schools, safe streets and a world-leading NHS – then the Scottish Conservatives will be their voice”. In its utter banality, this pitch is entirely in keeping with the depth of Scottish Tory policy thinking since 2011.
His other policy ideas have been more controversial. It was meant to be a playful interview in 2017. Quickfire questions on daft topics, the kind of thing politicians participate in to burnish their credentials as good-hearted ordinary punters who don’t take themselves too seriously. Nothing should have come of it. We learned, for example, that if you fire up the
Karaoke machine, Douglas Ross’s song is Atomic Kitten’s Whole Again and that he doesn’t share his wife’s enthusiasm for Robbie Williams. “If you were a prime minister for a day, without any repercussions, what would you do?” Ross’s millennial interviewer enquired in a bright and happy voice.
A range of more and less deranged Tory answers would have been acceptable here. “Reintroduce the death penalty.” “Abolish the Human Rights Act.” “Invade France.” “Make my brother into a baron.” Admissible vaseline-tinted responses could have included “triple funding for cancer research”. “Free money for every child.” “World peace.” But put on the spot by this softball question, Ross’s political imagination leapt immediately to “tougher enforcement against gypsy travellers”. He has since apologised for his use of language and the lack of context for this eye-peeling answer, but that’s hardly the point. The late Maya Angelou has a line worth remembering, whether in your personal or political life: “When people show you who they are, believe them.”
THIS weekend, Mr Ross launched his leadership website. We see him gazing, statesmanlike, into the middle distance. But the tone and emphasis of this political unknown’s pitch for national leadership strikes me as decidedly weird. Reading through his campaign messages, if you were half cut or half asleep, you could be forgiven for thinking Ross was running to be Ruth Davidson’s deputy. Indeed, Ross seems to regard the opportunity to re-activate Davidson as one of the principal attractions of his leadership.
READ MORE: Ruth Davidson 'proud and excited' to call Douglas Ross her boss
He tells us that he wants Davidson “back on the park, so we have the best chance of setting out a positive, strong message to all Scotland”, arguing that if he’s elected, “it will very much be a joint ticket”. “We will get our best striker back on the pitch,” he says. Now I’m no expert on footballing matters – but the political analysis behind these tortured soccer metaphors strikes me as a little odd.
Why would a leadership campaign launched by a comparative unknown spend the greater part of its energy gushing about the indispensable virtues of a predecessor who is leaving Holyrood in a handful of months? Davidson’s blessing must give Ross an advantage if the race is internally contested – but if the new-minted Baroness is the party’s “best striker,” then what precisely is Douglas Ross’s role here? Anonymous defender? Nifty midfielder? Tumbledown linesman? Anonymous punter belting out the staunch old songs on the terraces? The second best candidate for the job? Just who’s supposed to be running this show anyway?
The Ruth Davidson For A Strong Opposition Party – briefly rebranded as the Ruth Davidson For First Minister Party – now seems to have transformed into the Ruth Davidson For Douglas Ross For A Strong Opposition Party. Or the Douglas Ross For Ruth Davidson For A Strong Opposition Party. Is the magic plan that Lady Davidson of Christ-Knows-Where for Christ-Knows-What will pretend she’s leading the Scottish Tory Party into May, hoping that the voting punters don’t notice that she’s actually abandoning her Edinburgh Central seat just as they cast their votes? How can you run on a joint ticket with someone who is giving up the ghost and graduating into an ermine overcoat when the voters go the polls?
There is a palpable air of nostalgia and lack of confidence in Ross’s opening pitch, harkening back to the happier days when Brexit wasn’t biting, when Boris wasn’t PM, the headlines and polling lines were kinder, and the UK Government’s faltering communications around coronavirus hadn’t scraped off what shine remains on Her Majesty’s Government. Ross has explicitly positioned himself as the “don’t you wish Ruth Davidson didn’t resign?” candidate. I don’t know about you, but I’m struggling to experience that as an inspirational vision for the future. For the Scottish Tories, this is a rearguard action now.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel