THE visa debacle keeping Heyam Srour’s family apart is further proof of Home Office incompetence, according to the director of a UK-wide organisation.
Migrant Voice was set up to empower those settling in the UK and counter the hostile narratives about immigration.
With hubs in Glasgow, the West Midlands and London, the organisation works to counter xenophobia, strengthen communities, influence policy and promote “justice”.
Its director Nazek Ramadan says the delay and error faced by Heyam’s family is all too common – and should not happen at all.
She said: “Being a migrant in the UK is expensive enough, even if the Home Office gets all its decisions right. From October, renewing a standard leave to remain visa for two-and-a-half years will cost a staggering £2600 – and that’s per person.
“But in countless cases the Home Office wrongly rejects applications, loses documents, gets names wrong or sends important letters to the wrong address.
“All too often, the costs of those mistakes fall back on the person themselves. And these costs aren’t just financial – the stress and uncertainty can have severe and lasting impacts on individuals and families.”
Her comments come as commercial insurance broker Colin Swinney and civil partner Raul Marchena Magadan tell how errors by officials cost them a four-figure sum and prevented Marchena Magadan from becoming a British citizen.
READ MORE: Refugee's anguish as visa mix-up scuppers flights
The Cuban national, who leads the Spanish language programme at Reading University, came to the UK to study 16 years ago.
He applied for British citizenship in 2018 but his application was wrongly refused after officials erroneously claimed that he had broken immigration rules by working without the right to do so while renewing his right to remain between 2006-09.
But the department’s own emails to his solicitor confirm that he was allowed to work – and the only reason for the long delay in renewing his leave to remain was that the Home Office misplaced his file.
The refusal left the pair, who live near Manchester, £1330 out of pocket and Raul without citizen status.
Colin described their treatment as “insulting”. “At one point they said Raul had been working as a nurse,” he said. “He’s never worked as a nurse, they must have mixed him up with someone else. How can this be so badly organised?
“He has always been entitled to work. This is just down to somebody who hasn’t looked at the right paperwork and ticked a box and said ‘no’.
“If we’d taken it to a tribunal, he’d probably have won, but we didn’t know we could do that at the time.
“These people are invisible, you can’t get to them at all to speak to them and sort out what’s happening. It infuriates me.”
Last week Home Secretary Priti Patel said she will create a “fair, humane, compassionate and outward-looking Home Office that represents people from every corner of our diverse society” following the scathing review of her department’s handling of the Windrush scandal.
Ramadan said: “We need fundamental reform of the Home Office, but we also need competent decision-making, and free, easy ways for people to get refunds, make complaints, and have decisions reviewed. These simple changes would save everyone money, time and stress – so why does it seem so hard to do?”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here