THERE can have been few stranger journeys in life than that taken by Clive Ponting, the top civil servant who lost his career and risked a long jail sentence to tell the world the truth about the sinking of the General Belgrano during the Falklands War.
He went on to become a respected history professor and author and on moving to Scotland in his retirement he became committed to the cause of Scottish independence.
His death last week at the age of 74 provoked many recollections of his extraordinarily brave action in 1984 when he leaked confidential documents about the sinking of the Belgrano. He was at that time a senior civil servant at the Ministry of Defence and knew the Thatcher Government’s position that the
Argentine cruiser – formerly the USS Phoenix and a survivor of Pearl Harbour– was heading for the Falklands when it was sunk was frankly a lie.
Labour MP Tam Dalyell had tried for many months to get at the truth, which was that the Belgrano was actually heading away from the islands when the order was given to sink the ship with the loss of over 300 sailors, but the MoD and the Government stuck to their story.
Ponting posted the so-called “Crown Jewels” documents to Dalyell who in turn passed them to the chairman of then Foreign Affairs select committee inquiring into the sinking. The Tory chairman, Sir Anthony Kershaw, immediately gave them to Defence Minister Michael Heseltine and Ponting was quickly identfied as the leaker.
He would have resigned quietly but the Tory Government wanted Ponting’s head and he was charged under the Official Secrets Act. His trial in 1985 rested on his defence that he had acted in the interests of the state, but the biased judge Anthony McCowan said the “interests of the state” were whatever the Government said they were.
The jury were not going to be bullied and sensationally found Ponting not guilty. The Thatcher Government responded by tightening up the Official Secrets Act to remove any chance of a “public interest” defence.
Thatcher actually liked and respected Ponting having given him an OBE for his clever plans to cut wasteful expenditure. He had been seen very much as a Whitehall mandarin heading for the top but having resigned from the civil service he went back to his first love, history, and eventually became a noted historian and author of several books.
He retired from his post at the University of Wales in Swansea in 2004, and ended up in Kelso in 2016 with his fourth wife Diane Johnson.
Ponting’s commitment to the cause of Scottish independence came from his observation of the way that Westminster and Whitehall under the Tories were doing everything in their power to frustrate devolution.
In several conversations with him, he told me of his fear that the Tories would use Brexit to undermine devolution. I asked him if he would go public and he did so quite memorably at a packed hall in the Borders.
He said: “There is no doubt that the Conservatives see Brexit as the way to completely neuter devolution, and they intend to do it – they are ruthless enough to do it. And if it is no deal, I think it’s inevitable that the Government will take emergency powers to deal with the problems.
“And I know what some of the emergency powers are because I drafted them for the run-up to nuclear war and they are not likely to be that much different, and it’s not impossible that the emergency powers will actually dissolve the Scottish Parliament.”
We should heed the warnings of this brave man.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel