CHANCELLOR Rishi Sunak is in Scotland today for what has been called a “flying visit” by the SNP.
He is the fourth minister to travel to Scotland in recent weeks, after Boris Johnson instructed his Cabinet members to be more visible north of the Border following polling putting support for independence at 54%.
Throughout the coronavirus crisis, Sunak and his colleagues have argued the pandemic shows the strength of the Union – chiefly using the furlough scheme as an example of the support given to UK residents in recent months.
There have been rumours, however, that Sunak is not as passionate a Unionist as his fellow Cabinet members. In April he was forced to deny he told colleagues that “England should break away” from the UK.
READ MORE: Chancellor Rishi Sunak 'argued England should break away from UK'
After being in post for less than two months, Sunak denied he argued the UK did not “make financial sense” after the claim was made in a Financial Times article. In a Twitter post he said he is a “strong believer in our union of four nations”.
Comments Sunak made in 2017, amid speculation of Scottish Government plans for an independence referendum between autumn 2018 and spring 2019, have resurfaced – putting those "strong" beliefs into question.
Prior to becoming a minister, the Richmond MP rejected blocking a second Scottish independence referendum outright. He suggested pushing the vote until after the 2021 Scottish Parliament election.
He said: “It seems hard to block a referendum but we should push the timing until after Brexit so the choice is clearer for people. A good deal will strengthen the case for the Union.”
The comment resurfaced as former Scottish secretary David Mundell said there should be no indyref2 even if pro-independence parties secure a large majority next year.
He told Times Radio: “My view is that whatever the results of next year Scottish Election parliament that would not automatically lead to another referendum”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel