THE BBC has come under fire for a "voyeuristic and distasteful" report of migrants crossing the English Channel.
The BBC filmed around 20 migrants who were spotted halfway across the English Channel on a rubber dinghy at around 6.20am on Monday morning.
They were packed together on board the blue and grey boat, which was being powered across the Dover Strait by a single outboard engine.
The dinghy was visibly low in the water as they sat huddled together wearing orange lifejackets.
Reporter Simon Jones, who was at the scene, told viewers: "You can see why it's dangerous today because the sea is pretty choppy and then we came across this boat around half an hour ago, just spotted it on the horizon."
The camera then zooms into the migrants and one is seen constantly bailing out water from the floor of the dinghy using a plastic container.
"We have seen them actually trying to get water out the boat," Jones continued. "They are doing that at the moment. They are using a plastic container to try to bail out the boat. Obviously it's pretty overloaded."
As choppy waters pushed the vessel up and down, Jones said: "They are wearing life jackets but it is pretty dangerous the number of people on board that boat."
When asked if they were all right, the migrants shouted back that they were OK, and said they were from Syria.
Jones added: "They say they're from Syria. They say they're OK. I can see there are some women on board. Majority men."
He then asks where the migrants are going, saying: "Their destination is Dover obviously so at the moment they're motoring through the channel. At the moment the boat seems to be safe, the engine seems to be going. When we were out on the Channel on Friday, the boat actually got very close to the white cliffs before it actually broke down. At the moment, pretty choppy out there, they are bailing the boat out from time to time but they seem to be safe at the moment. Obviously, the coastguard has been alerted and they will be on their way.
"This is a sight that is increasingly common in the Channel. We heard from the coastguard that a boat had set out early this morning but no one was quite sure where it was ... but then suddenly we spotted it. You can spot them from the lifejackets, the colour of the lifejackets makes it clear in the distance.
He concluded: "In the moment, this boat is heading towards Dover, so we'll shadow it and see how this situation develops."
The report received severe criticism on social media.
SNP MP and former BBC journalist John Nicolson said he wouldn't have presented such a "voyeuristic and distasteful" report.
He tweeted: "I presented @BBCBreakfast. This is voyeuristic and distasteful. Had I been presenting I'd have argued strenuously against this sequence as broadcast. Who are these people? What is their story? Why are they fleeing? They're being used as a Farage-esque backdrop."
I presented @BBCBreakfast This is voyeuristic and distasteful. Had I been presenting I'd have argued strenuously against this sequence as broadcast. Who are these people? What is their story? Why are they fleeing? They're being used as a Farage-esque backdrop. https://t.co/IsWhwnS2v8
— JOHN NICOLSON M.P. (@MrJohnNicolson) August 10, 2020
Holyrood Magazine journalist Liam Kirkaldy said: "This is horrific. Surprised he didn't try to climb in there with them. Do some vox pops."
This is horrific. Surprised he didn't try to climb in there with them. Do some vox pops. https://t.co/vmiIlGHEnJ
— Liam Kirkaldy (@HolyroodLiam) August 10, 2020
Journalist and author James Felton described it as "dystopian" while former Labour MP Paul Sweeney said it is "perverse voyeurism".
What kind of dystopian shit is this https://t.co/SCePZZSyZN
— James Felton (@JimMFelton) August 10, 2020
This isn't journalism, it's perverse voyeurism. https://t.co/O1YXgy1C7h
— Paul Sweeney (@PaulJSweeney) August 10, 2020
Tom Carr said: "This is just bizarre... Am I the only one who is watching this as if it's someone presenting some perverse, dark reality TV show?"
This is just bizarre... Am I the only one who is watching this as if it's someone presenting some perverse, dark reality TV show? https://t.co/02xUHnFswL
— Tom Carr (@ItsMeTomC) August 10, 2020
Others said the BBC should be helping the migrants.
They're commentating it rather than helping them?? Who cares about their gender?? they have a right to live!! HOW is this real life?? https://t.co/1W0QH4SS3e
— Rach💛🌈(she/her) (@RachelHasson4) August 10, 2020
I honestly don't know what kind of human being could look upon this scene from a functioning boat and not offer some help. You'd have to be utterly devoid of empathy. Horrendous. https://t.co/hGM7U0V1KT
— grumpwitch: hurt the bible. hurt god. (@grumpwitch) August 10, 2020
This is disgraceful.
— WinstonSmith6times (@smith6times) August 10, 2020
The BBC boat should be rescuing these people and bringing them to safety.
Not looking at them as some sort of odd curiosity.
They are us.
We are human. https://t.co/ODI8Xo6TYt
This is still making me angry. BBC casually pulling alongside a boat of Syrian asylum seekers to fit in a quick interview before they wave off to let the coast guard have at it. These people are fleeing awful conditions and we're treating it like reality TV. Grim. https://t.co/sTOc3nwlPP
— Willeh (@DocCylon) August 10, 2020
More than 4000 migrants have now reached the UK so far this year, making the dangerous crossing across the world’s busiest shipping lane.
In the last few days alone, at least 597 people successfully managed to reach Britain by boat, and the political discussion around the issue has intensified.
Campaigners have accused Boris Johnson of using “inflammatory” soundbites as he described the migrants’ Channel crossings as a “very bad and stupid and dangerous and criminal thing to do”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel