JOHN Swinney will tomorrow be added to a very small list of three previous ministers – Alex Neil, Sarah Boyack and Sam Galbraith – to face the nerve-racking and potentially career-ending event of a no-confidence vote.
The first SNP government minister to have such a motion lodged against him was Neil in May 2014 as health secretary.
Neil survived the vote by 57-67 which was held after opposition parties criticised his handling over changes to mental health provision at Monklands Hospital.
However, later that year he was moved from the health post to the social justice brief and resigned from Cabinet in May 2016.
The previous minister to face a vote of no confidence was Labour’s transport minister Sarah Boyack in February 2001 after the motion was lodged by the SNP’s Bruce Crawford. It related to her handling of the trunk road management and maintenance tendering process.
Boyack, now a Labour MSP, saw off the motion by 33 to 70, but by November that year she was out of the Cabinet when then first minister Jack McConnell wielded the axe to his government team.
Notably, given tomorrow’s subject of the no-confidence motion in the Deputy First Minister and Education Secretary, the first no-confidence vote to be held at Holyrood related to the thorny subject of exam results and the Scottish Qualifications Authority.
READ MORE: SNP insiders say John Swinney is ‘walking wounded’ over exam results
It was lodged by the SNP and the Conservatives in Labour education minister Sam Galbraith and was defeated by 66 votes to 52, with one abstention.
The opposition parties said that Galbraith was to blame for the poor handling of exams results that summer. He was staunchly defended by the first minister Henry McLeish.
The SNP and the Tories maintained that Galbraith was ultimately responsible for problems which led to thousands of pupils receiving late, incorrect or incomplete results.
Proposing the motion of no confidence, SNP education spokesman Michael Russell said such motions should be used sparingly. He said at the time: “The circumstances of this summer’s disaster for Scotland’s pupils, teachers and parents – the disaster of the failure of the Scottish Qualifications Authority – are surely serious enough for us to consider if there was an element of ministerial blame to be attached to what took place.
“And if such blame does attach, then surely the unprecedented events of this summer demand unprecedented ministerial and parliamentary responses.”
Russell said Galbraith should no longer be a minister as he failed to act at “key times during the SQA crisis”. He also accused Galbraith of an operational and policy failure.
By the time the vote was taken Galbraith had been demoted by McLeish from education to environment. But within three months of surviving the vote, in March 2001, Galbraith announced his resignation from ministerial office and his parliamentary seat for health reasons.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel