RUTH Davidson has been forced to defend her decision to take a job-for-life at the unelected House of Lords.
During a heated exchange at First Minister's Questions, the soon-to-be Baroness insisted she was simply going to "another parliament."
The former Scottish Tory leader is temporarily fronting the party’s group in Holyrood following the ousting of Jackson Carlaw, and the uncontested election of Douglas Ross as leader.
Though it was claimed at the time that Carlaw had chosen to stand down of his own accord, the process has been dogged by claims of a plot.
It's known that Davidson and Ross met just days before their colleague decided the top job wasn't for him.
During Thursday’s First Minister’s Questions, Davidson challenged Sturgeon over John Swinney’s ministerial record.
How to hand an actual “arse on plate” recipe provided by Nicola Sturgeon pic.twitter.com/GOg14OfFBE
— Janey Godley (@JaneyGodley) August 12, 2020
“Next week marks five years since Nicola Sturgeon announced that education would be her number one priority," she said.
"And in those five years she's pulled Scotland out of international tests, her flagship education bill was scrapped, Named Person was struck down by the courts, poor students have been punished by a persistent attainment gap, hundreds of teacher vacancies are left unfilled, and we've just seen the biggest exam fiasco in the history of devolution.”
Davidson added: “John Swinney has been the common denominator through all of this and the First Minister's loyalty to a colleague may be commendable but her real loyalty should be to the parents and the pupils of Scotland. They deserve new leadership in education and John Swinney cannot deliver it. Why won't the First Minister?
Responding, Sturgeon said: "I'm not sure loyalty to colleagues is a strong suit for Ruth Davidson."
She added: "I won't write to universities. The reason for that is because John Swinney has already spoken to the universities. She says we won't publish how the SQA is working. And the reason I won't instruct them to do that today is because they did it last week.
"And, of course, in terms of teachers in our schools, there are more teachers in our schools today than there was when I became First Minister, and we've just funded local authorities to employ more teachers in our schools."
She added: "You know my mind is not particularly on political matters this morning but if Ruth Davidson wants to have this kind of exchange, she really should think about the position from which she seeks to do it, because just in a few months, I will submit myself and my government to the verdict of the Scottish people in an election.
"That is the ultimate accountability for our record and our leadership.
"And as we do that. Ruth Davidson will be pulling on an ermine and going to the unelected House of Lords.
"Can I gently suggest to Ruth Davidson, that when it comes to holding to account and scrutinising politicians, she's really not coming at this from a position of strength, because it is not me, who's running away from democratic accountability."
A sheepish Davidson replied: "The former leaders of the Labour Party, The Scottish Liberal Democrats, the Scottish Conservative Party might want to go and serve in another Parliament, yes, and she thinks that that's a bad thing, but not a word, not a word of condemnation for the former leader of her party that would rather shill for Putin's prompt."
Sturgeon said she didn't "criticise anybody for wanting to serve in any parliament".
"I just have an old fashioned preference that they get elected," she added.
Green MSP, Ross Greer, wasn't impressed with Davidson's return to frontline politics.
It was, he said, an "absolute travesty"
Ruth Davidson made an absolute travesty of not only her first #FMQs back but the first FMQs since this government's single biggest u-turn. Open goal, missed. The House of Lords is lucky to have her...
— Ross Greer (@Ross_Greer) August 12, 2020
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel