JOURNALIST Stephen Daisley has come under fire for calling for a new "Act of Union" to "enhance the unity of the United Kingdom".
Writing in The Spectator, Daisley says this should include Westminster legislating in devolved areas, getting rid of the Scottish Parliament, making elections and refendums reserved matters and stop spending taxpayers' money on reserved matters.
He says these changes "would be met by the full force of hysterical self-pity and imagined oppression that the Scottish establishment can muster".
Daisley warns Scotland leaving the Union could lead to Northern Ireland and Wales to follow.
Referencing the new poll that put support for independence at 53%, he says Scotland leaving the Union would cause "indignity, if not humiliation, on the world stage".
The survey, conducted by YouGov, found 57% of people in Scotland planned to back for Sturgeon's party in May - meaning the SNP would return a record 74 MSPs - up from 63 currently.
It would mean the SNP would be the most powerful party of government since the Scottish Parliament was re-established in 1999.
READ MORE: Yes support soars as SNP set for record Holyrood majority
The poll also put Nicola Sturgeon's net approval rating at +50 while the Prime Minister lagged behind at -50. Since last year, it marked a boost of 45 points for Sturgeon and a decrease of 16 for the Tory leader.
Daisley claims this is because the FM has "benefited" from coronavirus briefings being broadcast on the BBC and that it points to "longer trends in Scottish politics".
"Scotland has tended towards a dominant-party system," he writes.
"The Scottish Liberal party more than once took over 80 per cent of the popular vote and a century later Scottish Labour began an election-winning streak of 14 in a row. The SNP is simply this era’s dominant party."
He goes on to say that Holyrood has been "weaponised by the Nationalists as a Trojan horse against the very Union that devolution was meant to secure".
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon's approval rating soars in new YouGov survey
Daisley suggests that if Johnson says no to indyref2, Sturgeon will either take legal action or follow the Plan B route which would see next year's Holyrood vote as a proxy plebiscite on independence.
Senior figures in the independence movement, including MP Angus MacNeil and councillor Chris McEleny, back this idea but there is little support for it among the party's leadership.
There are fears that anything other than a legally watertight vote taking place will mean any referendum result is ignored by the international community.
But Daisley says: "The UK may be heading for a Catalan-style stand-off between Holyrood and Westminster."
The article was met with intense criticism on Twitter, with National columnist Andrew Tickell calling it "a complete abomination".
Bravo @JournoStephen! This is a complete abomination. Consider this cybernat duly triggered. https://t.co/fw7qyscLRX
— PeatWorrier (@PeatWorrier) August 12, 2020
Here are the best reactions:
1.
Look I know it's 2020. I know that norms and expectations have been obliterated. I know people are worried, even scared, and acting irrationally.
— James McEnaney (@MrMcEnaney) August 12, 2020
But none of that is an excuse for taking Stephen Daisley seriously.
2.
I really wanted to stop reading after the first word. Scexit.
— The Earl of Sked #FlattenTheCurve (@CyberHibby) August 12, 2020
How to infuriate progressive thinking Scots and increase support for independence by Stephen Daisley.
Worth reading just to understand the mind of deluded Britnat propaganda merchants.https://t.co/NQQ11WLBvd
3.
The case for a new Act of Union Stephen Daisley will almost certainly increase support for Independence with such nonsense https://t.co/NQOyfF3XwH via @spectator
— THE BLACK SALTIRE#FBSI (@80_mcswan) August 12, 2020
4.
In which Stephen Daisley shows his contempt for democracy.
— Mimi Augello (@MimiAugello) August 12, 2020
"Damn Jocks keep voting the wrong way. So let's stop them voting on anything important."https://t.co/qwJO0nDaZB
5.
#BreakingNews in a new blow to @RuthDavidsonMSP & @Douglas4Moray chances in the Scottish Elections Stephen Daisley announces he plans to spend next 6 months doing everything he can to promote an Act of Union that will destroy Holyrood because that's what the Scottish voter wants
— kevinjwoods (@kevinjwoods1) August 12, 2020
6.
Stephen Daisley’s article is astounding.
— Guffers (@gavmacn) August 12, 2020
1: Irish peace process at risk if enacted.
2: We’ll do what we like, you don’t have a say.
3: All leaders in The Vow in 2014 agreed to the permenance of Holyrood.
4: Stripping powers from Holyrood.
5: Know your place. pic.twitter.com/Pw9mpEmNSE
7.
Will Stephen Daisley survive Scottish Independence?
— Oor Bee🎗 (@homelesshorse) August 12, 2020
How upset can a man get?
8.
Hi @WeAreSTV @STVNews - can you answer a simple question? Who within STV Towers, EVER thought that Stephen Daisley was suitable to be employed by your organisation? Yes he's long gone, but it still baffles me to this day. 🤦https://t.co/Ke75MMeVqF
— Martin Cunningham 🏴 (@M4rtyman) August 12, 2020
9.
The Spectator, magazine closely linked to Boris Johnson & his cabinet, has published a call for Tories to seize powers to shut the Scottish Parliament, rip up the devolution settlement, & move more powers to Westminster. A hint for moderates on where Tory thinking is going.
— Michael Gray (@GrayInGlasgow) August 12, 2020
10.
This is the very definition of reactionary constitutionalism. Actually worse. In search of a past that never was.
— James Mitchell (@ProfJMitchell) August 12, 2020
Watch out for next edition of @scepticalscot on problems for Conservatives and the Union. https://t.co/vW4WdO2WaA
11.
I very much enjoyed Stephen Daisley's article myself.
— Mhairi Hunter (@MhairiHunter) August 12, 2020
R ather
A stonishing
T erribly
T ense
L aughably
E xtreme
D esperation.
12.
I’m not by any means a Scottish Nationalist but probably the best thing it has got going for it is that it drives Stephen Daisley insane and that is an enormous positive. https://t.co/c4WZtsmEHb
— Mr Demos of Pnyx (@gem_ste) August 12, 2020
13.
#stephendaisley calling for a new vote on the union comes as a shock #daisley4independence https://t.co/ZaJJ2nYOrA
— 𝕣𝕠𝕡𝕠𝕖𝕞 (@ropoem) August 12, 2020
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel