THE SNP should make their manifesto for next year’s election a “manifesto for independence” and publish it as soon as possible, one of the party’s most prominent activists has said.
Writing in The National, Julie Hepburn, a former candidate for deputy leader, and a former member of the party’s governing NEC, says Nicola Sturgeon needs to take “a completely different approach” to the 2021 campaign, “in order to put independence front-and-centre next May”.
This new paper, she says, should explain what a Scottish Government “could deliver with the powers of independence”.
Hepburn says this would sit alongside the SNP’s programme for government, which, she adds, should “focus on rebuilding from the pandemic”.
She writes: “That’s an important document, and crucial endeavour, but I don’t believe that should be the basis of our party’s election manifesto and campaign, because we don’t limit our ambitions to what the current constitutional settlement allows us to deliver.
“Yes, we are a party of government, but the SNP has always been more than a political party. We are a movement for independence.”
READ MORE: The SNP only exists for independence – it must be the focus
Hepburn says in the upcoming campaign the party must make a “clear distinction” between “governing a devolved parliament, and the potential of independence to make life so much better”.
This manifesto would not be a “White Paper 2.0” but rather a highlighting of “the positive changes that independence would allow us to pursue”.
“Let’s not expend energy arguing over the finer points of policies that the future governments of an independent Scotland may or may not decide to pursue, and focus our arguments on the wider principles of self-government and the potential that gives us to transform our country for the better.
“Independence is the reason the SNP exists. It should be the focus of our election campaign. The election will be a de facto referendum on independence anyway, so let’s grasp that opportunity to make the positive case.”
Responding to Hepburn’s article, an SNP source told The National: “It is quite safe to assume that independence will feature prominently in the next year’s Scottish parliament
election manifesto.”
That echoed comments made last week by Nicola Sturgeon, when she said independence supporters could be “safely assured” of an explicit commitment to indyref2 in the next manifesto.
In an interview with BBC Scotland, Sturgeon described people questioning her commitment to independence as “bonkers”.
She said: “I’ve spent my entire adult life campaigning for Scottish independence, I believe in Scottish independence with every fibre of my being, I also believe that Scotland is going to be independent sooner rather than later and I’m also the SNP leader that now presides over support for Scottish independence.
“Let’s just say I’m pretty comfortable in my own commitment to independence and other people can question it if they want, but I think it’s bonkers.
“The SNP is in a position of strength that parties the world over would love to be in, and we’ve got as a party to recognise that we don’t exist in some kind of bubble, we are the governing party of Scotland.
“Right now the majority of the people in the country we serve are worried about their health, they’re worried about their jobs, they’re worried about their ability to pay their bills.”
A string of opinion polls has recently shown majority support for independence. A YouGov poll this week, put Yes on 53%, up two points from January and the highest level of support for independence recorded by the polling firm.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel