SNP voters were asked to compare Nicola Sturgeon and Alex Salmond’s leadership in a new poll for The Times.
The YouGov poll results showed voters who support the SNP – and those who back other parties – see Sturgeon as the better first minister.
Among voters in general, 5% backed Salmond compared with 60% who felt Sturgeon had been a better leader. About 8% said the two had equally good records, while 20% said neither performed well.
Among SNP voters, just 3% backed Salmond while 83% backed Sturgeon. About 11% said they had performed equally well, and 1% said neither had done a good job.
READ MORE: Influential activist Julie Hepburn says SNP must make 2021 about indy
But last month, a poll carried out for the Wings Over Scotland website found 26% of voters would definitely or probably give their list vote to a party led by the former first minister.
The research conducted by Panelbase said 45% of Yes voters would definitely or probably vote for such a party.
The research was hypothetical as Salmond has not said he would set up his own party.
The YouGov figures come after this week’s poll from the firm put Sturgeon’s approval rating at +50, up 45 points on last year. Meanwhile Prime Minister Boris Johnson was at -50, a decrease of 16 points.
The survey also put support for independence at 53%, following two Panelbase polls putting Yes at 54%.
Writing in today’s National, Julie Hepburn, an influential activist, calls on the SNP to make next year’s manifesto a “manifesto for independence”.
She calls on Sturgeon to talk a “completely different approach” to the campaign “in order to put independence front-and-centre next May”.
She writes: “Independence is the reason the SNP exists. It should be the focus of our election campaign. The election will be a de facto referendum on independence anyway, so let’s grasp that opportunity to make the positive case.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel