ENGLAND’S exam result fiasco looks set to end in the courts with ministers in London refusing to take the same approach as Scotland.
There are now a number of students preparing legal action after they saw their A-level grades dropped from As and Bs to Ds or even Us.
As in Scotland, with exams cancelled, pupils’ grades were based on teachers’ assessments, which were then moderated by regulator Ofqual.
Also as in Scotland, the computer algorithm used by the body looked at the history of achievement of the pupil’s school, leading to thousands of A-level students having their marks downgraded because of where they studied, rather than because of their work. This had a disproportionate impact on students living in areas of deprivation.
However, unlike in Scotland, there is little appetite in government to revert back to teachers’ marks.
Last week, Gavin Williamson criticised the Scottish approach, saying the system had no controls. He said: “You’ve got rampant grade inflation. There’s been no checks and balances; it degrades every single grade.”
Yesterday hundreds of A-level students headed to Westminster in protest against Williamson’s decision.
Around 300 students peacefully demonstrated in Parliament Square, outside the Department for Education in Great Smith Street and opposite Downing Street.
The demonstrators called for Education Secretary Williamson to resign, as well as for universities to honour the offers they had previously made to students.
There was also much criticism of Ofqual yesterday, after they withdrew guidance on appealing just hours after publishing it. On Saturday afternoon, the exams regulator said grades from mock exams and coursework could be used to challenge results that have been downgraded.
It also said teacher’s predicted grades would be used if they are lower than the mock exam grade.
However, Williamson last week gave a “triple-lock” commitment that students could use the highest result out of their teacher’s predicted grade, their mock exam or sitting an actual exam in the autumn.
Then just seven hours later Ofqual withdrew the guidance.
Robert Halfon, the Tory chairman of the education committee, called it a “huge mess”. “Goodness knows what is going on at Ofqual,” he said.
“It sows confusion amongst pupils, headteachers, school teachers. It’s the last thing we need at this time.”
He accused Ofqual of using “Kafkaesque exam grades that no one understands,” adding: “This is just unacceptable.”
Ruth Davidson, the former Scottish Tory leader, called for Williamson “to get out on the television” and tell “people what’s going on”.
“He needs to be telling Ofqual what is going to happen, he needs to grip this,” she added.
However, Davidson didn’t make any calls for Williamson to resign over the affair.
One other stark difference between England and Scotland is that the UK Labour party have seemingly been muted in their criticism of the Government.
Yesterday, Tony Blair’s former spin-doctor Alastair Campbell tweeted: “I am beyond rage at government incompetence/venality re exams etc. But I’m getting not far behind on rage front at @UKLabour inability to take them apart and force change on it.
“They are the Opposition. Not commentators saying how shit things are. Plenty of us can do that outside.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel