SCOTLAND’S most senior civil servant is to be the first witness questioned by MSPs investigating the Scottish Government's handling of harassment allegations against Alex Salmond.
Permanent Secretary Leslie Evans will appear before members of the Committee on the Scottish Government Handling of Harassment Complaints, which was set up last year.
It came after the Court of Session in Edinburgh ruled the Scottish Government's actions in dealing with the complaints made were "unlawful" – with ministers paying out £512,250.
Salmond, who was this year cleared of 13 sexual offences by a jury, will give evidence to the committee at a later date – as will his successor, First Minister Nicola Sturgeon.
The committee has already agreed the unusual step of taking evidence from witnesses under oath.
READ MORE: Alex Salmond inquiry: Government insists FM's chief of staff can't give evidence
The meeting comes after a union representing civil servants raised concerns about "bullying behaviour" within the Scottish Government.
In a submission to the committee, Dave Penman, general secretary of the FDA union, said by the time the Scottish Government published a Fairness at Work policy in 2010 "the culture within the former first minister's office and other ministerial offices in relation to bullying behaviour became a concern for us".
The issue was raised with successive permanent secretaries, Penman said, adding while action was taken "and short-term improvements or apologies were made, this did not bring about an overall change in culture".
He told the committee: "Some civil servants expressed to us that they were operating in a culture of fear and were unable to speak truth unto power and discharge their duties effectively.
"The culture within the ministerial offices in the organisation was such that despite the support of FDA, some members made clear to us that they did not trust SG (Scottish Government) to handle complaints effectively or to ensure confidentiality of the complainants.
"They furthermore expressed concerns over the effectiveness of the policies at that time.
"In particular, members in the former first minister's office indicated that they felt isolated and out of the policy protection of the rest of the SG."
Meanwhile, the Scottish Government has said it will not waive legal professional privilege when providing documents to the committee.
Convener Linda Fabiani previously said MSPs are concerned by "the limited information the Scottish Government has offered to justify the grounds for applying legal professional privilege".
But Deputy First Minister John Swinney said the privilege, which means private legal advice between a member of the profession and a client is able to remain secret, will remain in place during the inquiry.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article